首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species
【24h】

The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species

机译:根据植物学研究推荐为植物通用条形码的基因座可能不适用于同类物种,例如石D属物种的DNA条形码证明

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Based on the testing of several loci, predominantly against floristic backgrounds, individual or different combinations of loci have been suggested as possible universal DNA barcodes for plants. The present investigation was undertaken to check the applicability of the recommended locus/loci for congeneric species with Dendrobium species as an illustrative example. Results Six loci, matK, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, trnH-psbA spacer from the chloroplast genome and ITS, from the nuclear genome, were compared for their amplification, sequencing and species discrimination success rates among multiple accessions of 36 Dendrobium species. The trnH-psbA spacer could not be considered for analysis as good quality sequences were not obtained with its forward primer. Among the tested loci, ITS, recommended by some as a possible barcode for plants, provided 100% species identification. Another locus, matK , also recommended as a universal barcode for plants, resolved 80.56% species. ITS remained the best even when sequences of investigated loci of additional Dendrobium species available on the NCBI GenBank (93, 33, 20, 18 and 17 of ITS, matK, rbcL, rpoB and rpoC1 , respectively) were also considered for calculating the percent species resolution capabilities. The species discrimination of various combinations of the loci was also compared based on the 36 investigated species and additional 16 for which sequences of all the five loci were available on GenBank . Two-locus combination of matK+rbcL recommended by the Plant Working Group of Consortium for Barcoding of Life (CBOL) could discriminate 86.11% of 36 species. The species discriminating ability of this barcode was reduced to 80.77% when additional sequences available on NCBI were included in the analysis. Among the recommended combinations, the barcode based on three loci - matK, rpoB and rpoC1 - resolved maximum number of species. Conclusions Any recommended barcode based on the loci tested so far, is not likely to provide 100% species identification across the plant kingdom and thus is not likely to act as a universal barcode. It appears that barcodes, if based on single or limited locus(i), would be taxa specific as is exemplified by the success of ITS among Dendrobium species, though it may not be suitable for other plants because of the problems that are discussed.
机译:背景技术基于主要针对植物背景的几个基因座的测试,已经提出了基因座的单个或不同组合作为植物可能的通用DNA条形码。进行本研究以检查推荐的基因座/场所对石end属物种作为示例的同类物种的适用性。结果比较了来自叶绿体基因组和来自核基因组ITS的六个基因座,matK,rbcL,rpoB,rpoC1,trnH-psbA间隔子的扩增,测序和在36种石end石access种中的种区分成功率。 trnH-psbA间隔子不能考虑进行分析,因为其正向引物无法获得高质量的序列。在测试的基因座中,有人建议使用ITS作为植物的可能条形码,以提供100%的物种识别。另一个座位matK也被推荐为植物的通用条形码,可分辨80.56%的物种。即使还考虑了NCBI GenBank上可用的其他石end物种研究基因座的序列(分别是ITS的93、33、20、18和17,matK,rbcL,rpoB和rpoC1),ITS仍然是最好的物种解析能力。基于36个调查物种和GenBank上提供的所有5个基因座序列的另外16种,比较了该基因座的各种组合的物种辨别力。生命条形码协会植物工作组(CBOL)推荐的matK + rbcL的两基因位组合可以区分36种物种中的86.11%。当分析中包括NCBI上可用的其他序列时,该条形码的种类识别能力降低到80.7%。在推荐的组合中,基于三个基因座的条形码-matK,rpoB和rpoC1-解析了最大种类。结论到目前为止,任何基于测试基因座的推荐条形码都不可能在整个植物界提供100%的物种识别,因此不可能充当通用条形码。看来,条形码是基于单个或有限位点的,但由于石discussed种间ITS的成功应用,条形码将是特定种类的,尽管由于所讨论的问题它可能不适用于其他植物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号