...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Patients’ preferences for primary health care – a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
【24h】

Patients’ preferences for primary health care – a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments

机译:患者对基本医疗保健的偏好–离散选择实验的系统文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Primary care is a key element of health care systems and addresses the main health problems of the population. Due to the demographic change, primary care even gains in importance. The knowledge of the patients’ preferences can help policy makers as well as physicians to set priorities in their effort to make health care delivery more responsive to patients’ needs. Our objective was to describe which aspects of primary care were included in preference studies and which of them were the most preferred aspects. Methods In order to elicit the preferences for primary care, a systematic literature search was conducted. Two researchers searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO) and conducted a narrative synthesis. Inclusion criteria were: focus on primary health care delivery, discrete choice experiment as elicitation method, and studies published between 2006 and 2015 in English language. Results We identified 18 studies that elicited either the patients’ or the population’s preferences for primary care based on a discrete choice experiment. Altogether the studies used 16 structure attributes, ten process attributes and four outcome attributes. The most commonly applied structure attribute was “Waiting time till appointment”, the most frequently used process attribute was “Shared decision making / professional’s attention paid to your views”. “Receiving the ‘best’ treatment” was the most commonly applied outcome attribute. Process attributes were most often the ones of highest importance for patients or the population. The attributes and attribute levels used in the discrete choice experiments were identified by literature research, qualitative research, expert interviews, or the analysis of policy documents. Conclusions The results of the DCE studies show different preferences for primary health care. The diversity of the results may have several reasons, such as the method of analysis, the selection procedure of the attributes and their levels or the specific research question of the study. As the results of discrete choice experiments depend on many different factors, it is important for a better comprehensibility of the studies to transparently report the steps undertaken in a study as well as the interim results regarding the identification of attributes and levels.
机译:背景技术初级保健是卫生保健系统的关键要素,并解决了人口的主要健康问题。由于人口结构的变化,初级保健甚至变得越来越重要。了解患者的喜好可以帮助政策制定者和医生确定工作重点,以使医疗服务更加满足患者的需求。我们的目的是描述偏爱研究中包括哪些基层医疗服务,哪些是最优选的方面。方法为了引起人们对基层医疗的偏爱,进行了系统的文献检索。两名研究人员搜索了三个电子数据库(PubMed,Scopus和PsycINFO)并进行了叙述性综合。纳入标准包括:专注于初级卫生保健的提供,离散选择实验作为启发方法以及2006年至2015年间以英语发表的研究。结果我们根据一项离散选择实验,确定了18项引起患者或人群对初级保健偏爱的研究。这些研究总共使用了16个结构属性,10个过程属性和4个结果属性。最常用的结构属性是“等待约会的时间”,最常用的过程属性是“共同的决策/专业人员对您的观点的关注”。 “接受“最佳”治疗”是最常用的结果属性。过程属性通常是对患者或人群最重要的属性。离散选择实验中使用的属性和属性级别是通过文献研究,定性研究,专家访谈或政策文件分析来确定的。结论DCE研究的结果表明,对初级卫生保健的偏好不同。结果的多样性可能有多种原因,例如分析方法,属性及其水平的选择程序或研究的特定研究问题。由于离散选择实验的结果取决于许多不同的因素,因此对于更好地理解研究透明地报告研究中所采取的步骤以及关于识别属性和水平的中期结果非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号