...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >A survey of surgical team members’ perceptions of near misses and attitudes towards Time Out protocols
【24h】

A survey of surgical team members’ perceptions of near misses and attitudes towards Time Out protocols

机译:对外科手术团队成员对未命中的观念和对超时协议的态度的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Medical errors are inherently of concern in modern health care. Although surgical errors as incorrect surgery (e.g., wrong patient, wrong site, or wrong procedure) are infrequent, they are devastating events to experience. To gain insight about incidents that could lead to incorrect surgery, we surveyed how surgical team members perceive near misses and their attitudes towards the use of Time Out protocols in the operating room. We hypothesised that perceptions of near-miss experiences and attitudes towards Time Out protocols vary widely among surgical team members. Methods This cross-sectional study (N?=?427) included surgeons, anaesthetists, nurse anaesthetists, and operating room nurses. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items, 11 of which had dichotomous responses (0?=?no; 1?=?yes) and 3 of which had responses on an ordinal scale (never?=?0; sometimes?=?1; often?=?2; always?=?3). Items reflected team members’ experience of near misses or mistakes; their strategies for verifying the correct patient, site, and procedure; questions about whether they believed that these mistakes could be avoided using the Time Out protocol; and how they would accept the implementation of the protocol in the operating room. Results In the operating room, 38% of respondents had experienced uncertainty of patient identity, 81% had experienced uncertainty of the surgical site or side, and 60% had prepared for the wrong procedure. Sixty-three per cent agreed that verifying the correct patient, site, and procedure should be a team responsibility. Thus, only nurse anaesthetists routinely performed identity checks prior to surgery (P ≤ 0.001). Of the surgical team members, 91% supported implementation of a Time Out protocol in their operating rooms. Conclusion The majority of our surgical personnel experienced near misses with regard to correct patient identity, surgical site, or procedure. Routines for ensuring the correct patient, site, and surgical procedure must involve all surgical team members. We find that the near-miss experiences are a wake-up call for systematic risk reducing efforts and the use of checklists in surgery.
机译:背景技术医疗错误是现代医疗保健中固有的关注点。尽管由于错误的手术(例如错误的患者,错误的部位或错误的操作)而导致的外科手术错误很少发生,但它们却是灾难性的事件。为了深入了解可能导致错误手术的事件,我们调查了手术团队成员如何感知差错以及他们对在手术室中使用“超时”规程的态度。我们假设手术团队成员对未遂经验和对超时协议态度的看法差异很大。方法这项横断面研究(N?=?427)包括外科医生,麻醉师,麻醉师和手术室护士。问卷由14个项目组成,其中有11个回答是二分的(0?=否; 1?=是),其中3个是按顺序量表(从来没有== 0;有时是== 1;经常?=?2;总是?=?3)。项目反映了团队成员的差错或差错经历;他们用于验证正确的患者,部位和程序的策略;关于他们是否认为使用超时协议可以避免这些错误的问题;以及他们如何在手术室中接受协议的实施。结果在手术室中,有38%的受访者经历了患者身份的不确定性,有81%的经历了手术部位或一侧的不确定性,有60%的人准备了错误的手术方法。百分之六十三的人同意,验证正确的患者,部位和程序应由团队负责。因此,只有护士麻醉师会在手术前例行进行身份检查(P≤0.001)。在外科手术团队成员中,有91%支持在手术室中实施“超时”协议。结论我们的大多数外科手术人员在正确的患者身份,手术部位或手术方面都经历了差点错过。确保正确的患者,部位和手术程序的例程必须由所有手术团队成员参与。我们发现,近乎失误的经历是对系统降低风险的努力以及在手术中使用检查清单的警醒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号