首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users
【24h】

Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroduodenal ulcer scars: implications for clinical management of NSAIDs users

机译:胃内十二指肠溃疡疤痕内镜诊断中观察者间的差异:对NSAIDs使用者临床管理的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background A clinical history of peptic ulcer has been reported to be associated with a high rate of ulcer recurrence in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ( NSAID ) users. Therefore, it is a very important issue to precisely know the previous history prior to NSAIDs administration. To clarify the possible difficulty to identify the history, we determined the sensitivity and diagnostic concordance of endoscopy for the identification of ulcer scars indicative of previous clinical history of peptic ulcer diseases. Methods The first study enrolled 200 consecutive patients with a clinical history of gastric or duodenal ulcers previously confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The sensitivity of endoscopy for identifying scars was determined for these patients. In the second study, the extent of interobserver agreement was determined for 47 endoscopists who identified ulcer scars in endoscopic photographs of 30 sites of previous active gastric ulcers and 30 sites of previous active duodenal ulcers. The kappa coefficient of reliability was calculated to measure the interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of ulcer scars. Results Out of 190 patients eligible for analysis, 104 (54.7%) were found to have gastric or duodenal ulcer scars on endoscopy; there were no gastric or duodenal ulcer scars seen in the remaining patients (45%). In the second study, the kappa values for endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcer scars were 0.14 (95% CI 0.13-0.16) and 0.29 (95% CI 0.27-0.32), respectively. The addition of indigo-carmine chromoendoscopy did not provide a statistically significant improvement in diagnostic concordance in patients with gastric ulcer scar since the kappa value for chromoendoscopic diagnosis was 0.15; 95% CI 0.13-0.17 as low as for un-contrasted scars. Conclusions The sensitivity and concordance of endoscopic diagnosis of gastric and duodenal ulcer scars are not satisfactory for the use of endoscopy only to identify previous ulcer disease. To avoid the overlooking the previous clinical history of peptic ulcer diseases, the diagnosis of peptic ulcer scar has to be carefully done prior to NSAIDs administration.
机译:背景技术据报道,消化性溃疡的临床病史与非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)使用者的溃疡复发率高相关。因此,在管理NSAID之前准确了解以前的历史是非常重要的问题。为了阐明可能难以确定病史的原因,我们确定了内镜检查的敏感性和诊断一致性,以鉴定溃疡性疤痕,以指示消化性溃疡疾病以前的临床病史。方法第一项研究招募了200例经食管胃十二指肠镜检查确诊为胃或十二指肠溃疡临床病史的患者。确定了这些患者的内窥镜检查对疤痕的敏感性。在第二项研究中,确定了47位内镜医师的观察者之间达成共识的程度,他们在30例先前活动性胃溃疡和30例先前十二指肠溃疡活动的内窥镜照片中发现了溃疡疤痕。计算可靠性的κ系数,以测量观察者间在溃疡疤痕诊断上的一致性。结果190例符合条件的患者中,内镜检查发现104例(54.7%)有胃或十二指肠溃疡疤痕。其余患者中未见胃或十二指肠溃疡疤痕(45%)。在第二项研究中,内窥镜检查胃和十二指肠溃疡疤痕的卡伯值分别为0.14(95%CI 0.13-0.16)和0.29(95%CI 0.27-0.32)。靛蓝胭脂色内镜检查对胃溃疡疤痕患者的诊断一致性没有统计学上的显着改善,因为用于内窥镜检查的卡帕值为0.15。相对于未形成疤痕的95%CI 0.13-0.17低。结论胃镜和十二指肠溃疡疤痕的内镜诊断敏感性和一致性对于仅通过内镜检查来确定先前的溃疡病并不令人满意。为了避免忽视消化性溃疡疾病的先前临床史,必须在给予NSAID之前仔细进行消化性溃疡疤痕的诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号