...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler?, Ellipta? and HandiHaler? dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
【24h】

Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler?, Ellipta? and HandiHaler? dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial

机译:通过Breezhaler?,Ellipta?的峰值吸气流速的比较和HandiHaler? COPD中度至重度患者的干粉吸入器:一项随机交叉试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler?, the Ellipta? and the HandiHaler? inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40?years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices. In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min?±?SE) was observed with the Breezhaler? (108?±?23), followed by the Ellipta? (78?±?15) and the HandiHaler? (49?±?9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler? inhaler, followed by the Ellipta? inhaler and the HandiHaler? inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders. Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler? inhaler when compared with the Ellipta? and the HandiHaler? inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015.
机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的慢性和进行性要求自行服用吸入药物。干粉吸入器(DPI)越来越多地用于COPD的吸入疗法。选择DPI时的重要考虑因素包括所需的吸气量和患者达到的流速。在这里,我们比较了COPD患者通过Breezhaler?,Ellipta?在中等至非常严重的气流受限情况下获得的峰值吸气流速(PIF)值。和HandiHaler?吸入器。还评估了疾病严重程度,年龄和性别对PIF率的影响。这项随机,开放标签,多中心,交叉,IV期研究招募了中度至非常严重的气流受限(全球阻塞性肺疾病倡议2014年战略),年龄≥40岁且吸烟史≥10包的患者年份。在研究期间未施用活性药物或安慰剂。使用在咬嘴壁上装有压力抽头和换能器的吸入器记录吸入曲线。对于每个患者,从每个设备的三次重复吸入中选择具有最高PIF值的吸入进行分析。进行配对t检验以比较每种设备组合之间的平均PIF。总共招募了97名COPD患者并完成了研究。使用Breezhaler?观察到最高的平均PIF值(L / min?±?SE)。 (108?±?23),其次是Ellipta? (78±15)和HandiHaler? (49?±?9)吸入器和使用Breezhaler?记录的最低平均压降值。吸入器,然后是Ellipta吗?吸入器和HandiHaler?吸入器,在整个患者群体中。在所有年龄段的男女COPD严重程度所有亚组的患者中均观察到类似趋势。 COPD患者可以通过最少的吸气努力吸气,并通过Breezhaler产生最高的平均PIF值。吸入器与Ellipta相比?和HandiHaler?吸入器。无论患者的COPD严重程度,年龄或性别如何,这些结果都是相似的。该试验已于2015年11月4日在ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号