首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >What is important, what needs treating? How GPs perceive older patients’ multiple health problems: a mixed method research study
【24h】

What is important, what needs treating? How GPs perceive older patients’ multiple health problems: a mixed method research study

机译:重要的是什么,需要治疗的是什么?全科医生如何看待老年患者的多种健康问题:一项混合方法研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background GPs increasingly deal with multiple health problems of their older patients. They have to apply a hierarchical management approach that considers priorities to balance competing needs for treatment. Yet, the practice of setting individual priorities in older patients is largely unexplored. This paper analyses the GPs’ perceptions on important and unimportant health problems and how these affect their treatment. Methods GPs appraised the importance of health problems for a purposive sample of their older patients in semi-structured interviews. Prior to the interviews, the GPs had received a list of their patients’ health problems resulting from a geriatric assessment and were asked to rate the importance of each identified problem. In the interviews the GPs subsequently explained why they considered certain health problems important or not and how this affected treatment. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis and quantitative methods. Results The problems GPs perceive as important are those that are medical and require active treatment or monitoring, or that induce empathy or awareness but cannot be assisted further. Unimportant problems are those that are well managed problems and need no further attention as well as age-related conditions or functional disabilities that provoke fatalism, or those considered outside the GPs’ responsibility. Statements of professional actions are closely linked to explanations of important problems and relate to physical problems rather than functional and social patient issues. Conclusions GPs tend to prioritise treatable clinical conditions. Treatment approaches are, however, vague or missing for complex chronic illnesses and disabilities. Here, patient empowerment strategies are of value and need to be developed and implemented. The professional concepts of ageing and disability should not impede but rather foster treatment and care. To this end, GPs need to be able to delegate care to a functioning primary care team. Trial Registration German Trial Register (DRKS): 00000792
机译:背景全科医生越来越多地应对老年患者的多种健康问题。他们必须采用一种分级管理方法,该方法应考虑优先级以平衡竞争性治疗需求。但是,在年龄较大的患者中确定个人优先级的做法在很大程度上尚未得到探索。本文分析了全科医生对重要和不重要的健康问题的看法,以及这些问题如何影响他们的治疗。方法在半结构化访谈中,家庭医生评估了有目的的老年患者健康问题的重要性。在面试之前,全科医生已收到了由老年病评估导致的患者健康问题的清单,并要求他们对每个发现的问题的重要性进行评分。全科医生随后在访谈中解释了为什么他们认为某些健康问题是否重要以及这如何影响治疗。使用定性内容分析和定量方法分析数据。结果GP认为重要的问题是那些医疗方面,需要积极治疗或监测,或引起同理心或意识但无法得到进一步帮助的问题。不重要的问题是那些管理得当的问题,不需要进一步的关注,以及与年龄相关的状况或引起致死性的功能障碍,或者被视为全科医生的责任范围之外的问题。专业行动的陈述与重要问题的解释紧密相关,并且与身体问题有关,而与功能和社会患者问题无关。结论GP倾向于优先考虑可治疗的临床状况。然而,对于复杂的慢性疾病和残疾,治疗方法模糊不清或缺失。在这里,患者赋权策略很有价值,需要制定和实施。衰老和残疾的专业概念不应阻碍而是应促进治疗和护理。为此,全科医生需要能够将护理委托给运作中的初级护理团队。试用注册德国试用注册(DRKS):00000792

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号