首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Quality >Impact of straight to test pathways on time to diagnosis in oesophageal and gastric cancer
【24h】

Impact of straight to test pathways on time to diagnosis in oesophageal and gastric cancer

机译:直接测试路径对食道和胃癌诊断时间的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Cancer survival in the UK has doubled in the last 40 years; however, 1-year and 5-year survival rates are still lower than other countries. One cause may be a delay between referral into secondary care and subsequent investigation. We set out to evaluate the impact of a straight to test pathway (STTP) on time to diagnosis for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer.Methods Six hospital Trusts across the East Midlands Clinical Network introduced a STTP enabling general practitioners to refer patients with suspected UGI cancer (oesophageal/gastric) for immediate investigation, without the need to see a hospital specialist first. Data were collected for all patients referred between 2013 and 2015 with suspected UGI cancer and stratified by STTP or traditional referral pathway. Overall time from referral to diagnosis was compared. Data from two Trusts who did not implement STTP acted as control.Results 340 patients followed the STTP pathway and 495 followed the traditional route. STTP saved a mean of 7 days from referral to treatment (with a 95% CI of 3 to 11 days, p&0.008) and a mean of 16 days from referral to diagnosis, when compared with a traditional referral pathway. The number of diagnostic tests performed using STTP or traditional referral pathways were similar.Conclusion A STTP is associated with an overall reduction of 1?week from referral to treatment for UGI cancer. The approach is feasible and did not require more resource. Larger studies are required to assess whether this time saving translates into improved cancer outcomes.
机译:背景资料在过去的40年中,英国的癌症生存率翻了一番。但是,1年和5年生存率仍然低于其他国家。原因之一可能是转介至二级医疗和后续调查之间的延迟。我们着手评估直接测试途径(STTP)对上消化道(UGI)癌症诊断时间的影响。方法东米德兰兹临床网络的六家医院信托基金引入了STTP,使全科医生可以转诊可疑UGI患者癌症(食道/胃),以便立即进行检查,而无需先咨询医院专家。收集了2013年至2015年之间转诊的所有疑似UGI癌症并通过STTP或传统转诊途径进行分层的患者的数据。比较了从转诊到诊断的总时间。来自两个未实施STTP的Trust的数据作为对照。结果340例患者遵循STTP途径,而495例遵循传统途径。与传统的转诊途径相比,STTP从转诊到治疗平均节省7天(95%CI为3至11天,p <0.008),从转诊到诊断平均节省16天。使用STTP或传统转诊途径进行的诊断测试次数相似。结论STTP与从转诊到治疗UGI癌症的总体减少1周有关。该方法是可行的,不需要更多资源。需要更大的研究来评估这种节省时间是否可以转化为改善的癌症结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号