首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Quality >DC cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the emergency department: improving specialist protocols for the generalist
【24h】

DC cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the emergency department: improving specialist protocols for the generalist

机译:急诊科房颤和心房扑动的直流电复律:改善通才专家的治疗方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is a safe and effective treatment for recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter and when performed in the emergency department (ED), it can provide an excellent treatment option for patients as well as reducing unnecessary hospital admissions and healthcare costs. However, appropriate periprocedural anticoagulation is absolutely essential to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes, chiefly thromboembolic stroke. Our intention was for 100% of patients undergoing DCCV in the ED to receive appropriate periprocedural anticoagulation. Method We aimed to assess local practice with regards to periprocedural anticoagulation with a 1-year retrospective audit. We then undertook to deliver a multimodality educational programme in addition to producing new local protocols. Stakeholders were engaged within the cardiology, emergency medicine and governance departments as well as trust quality improvement team. This was undertaken across three PDSA cycles with prospective data collection on a rolling monthly basis with the use of real-time run charts, fed back to the ED. Teaching was delivered on a small group, electronic as well as departmental level, and a new protocol was created and delivered to guide clinicians in the management of patients with AF or flutter. Results While initial rates of periprocedural anticoagulation were suboptimal (with only 72% of eligible patients anticoagulated), following our programme of continuous monitoring and intervention, this steadily rose over the project timeline, achieving a high of 91% at the point of last data collection. Conclusion We should champion the high number of these procedures carried out in the ED setting, a pressured environment with multiple competing challenges. However, local protocols should reflect best-practice guidance regarding decision-making around selecting rate versus rhythm control strategies, appropriate use of medication and eligibility for anticoagulation as per individualised thrombotic risk. This will allow us to deliver effective interventions in a safe, patient-centred approach.
机译:背景技术直流电复律(DCCV)是一种用于近期发生的房颤(AF)或扑动的安全有效的治疗方法,当在急诊室(ED)进行时,它可以为患者提供出色的治疗选择,并减少不必要的医院入院和医疗费用。但是,进行适当的围手术期抗凝治疗绝对是降低不良后果(主要是血栓栓塞性中风)风险的必要条件。我们的意图是使100%在急诊室接受DCCV的患者接受适当的围手术期抗凝治疗。方法我们旨在通过1年回顾性审核来评估有关围手术期抗凝治疗的本地实践。然后,我们除了提供新的本地协议外,还承诺提供多模式教育计划。利益相关者参与了心脏病,急诊医学和治理部门以及信任质量改进团队。这是在三个PDSA周期中进行的,并使用实时运行图按月滚动收集预期数据,并反馈给ED。教学以小组形式,电子形式和部门形式进行,并且创建并提供了新的协议以指导临床医生对房颤或扑动患者进行管理。结果尽管我们的持续监测和干预计划使围手术期抗凝的初始率不理想(只有72%的合格患者抗凝),但在整个项目时间表中稳步上升,在最后一次数据收集时达到了91%的高位。结论我们应该拥护在急诊室进行的大量此类手术,这是一个充满多重竞争挑战的压力环境。但是,当地规程应反映出关于选择速率与节律控制策略,适当使用药物以及根据个体血栓形成风险进行抗凝治疗的资格有关决策的最佳实践指导。这将使我们能够以安全,以患者为中心的方法提供有效的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号