首页> 外文期刊>BMJ paediatrics open. >Oral paracetamol versus oral ibuprofen for closure of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates (32 weeks): a blinded, randomised, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial
【24h】

Oral paracetamol versus oral ibuprofen for closure of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates (32 weeks): a blinded, randomised, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial

机译:口服对乙酰氨基酚与口服布洛芬治疗早产新生儿(<32周)血液动力学显着的动脉导管未闭:一项盲,随机,主动对照,非劣效性试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Existing medical therapies with ibuprofen or indomethacin have multiple adverse effects. Hence, an alternative drug like paracetamol given through oral route with less side effects need to be tested in an appropriate study design with least risk of bias to arrive at a conclusion. Methods and analysis Multisite, randomised, active-controlled, non-inferiority design. The primary objective is to study the efficacy of oral paracetamol for closure of hsPDA in comparison to oral ibuprofen in preterm neonates of 32 weeks’ gestation. Randomisation web-based and allocation concealment would be done; the treating team, investigators, outcome assessors and laboratory personnel would be blinded from the intervention. Echocardiography images would be coded for independent review. Closure of PDA by the end of last dose of study drug or earlier would be the study endpoint. A sample size of 196 neonates would be enrolled with a non-inferiority margin of 15%. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis will be done to assess the effect of contamination and protocol violations in the primary outcome. Ethics and dissemination The trial would follow international code of ethics for clinical trial. The trial protocol was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee of all three centres. All serious adverse events would be reported in detail to the Institute Ethics Committee. A written informed consent would be obtained from one of the parents. No plan has been made for dissemination. Trial registration number CTRI/2014/08/004805.
机译:简介血液动力学显着的动脉导管未闭(hsPDA)是早产儿死亡和发病的常见原因。现有的布洛芬或消炎痛治疗药物具有多种不良反应。因此,需要在适当的研究设计中对通过口服途径给予的对乙酰氨基酚等副作用较小的替代药物进行测试,以使产生结论的偏倚风险最小。方法和分析多地点,随机,主动控制,非劣质性设计。主要目的是研究在妊娠32周以下的早产儿中口服扑热息痛与口服布洛芬相比,对hsPDA封闭的疗效。基于网络的随机化和分配隐藏。治疗团队,研究人员,结果评估者和实验室人员将无法进行干预。超声心动图图像将被编码以进行独立检查。在最后一剂研究药物或更早之前关闭PDA将成为研究终点。 196名新生儿的样本量将以15%的非劣质性入选。将进行意向性治疗和按方案分析,以评估主要结果中污染和违反规程的影响。伦理和传播该试验将遵循临床试验的国际伦理准则。所有三个中心的研究所伦理委员会均批准了该试验方案。所有严重不良事件将详细报告给研究所伦理委员会。可以从其中一位父母那里获得书面知情同意。尚未制定传播计划。试用注册号CTRI / 2014/08/004805。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号