首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Eccentric versus traditional resistance exercise for older adult fallers in the community: a randomized trial within a multi-component fall reduction program
【24h】

Eccentric versus traditional resistance exercise for older adult fallers in the community: a randomized trial within a multi-component fall reduction program

机译:社区老年跌倒者的偏心训练与传统抵抗训练:一项多组分减少跌倒计划中的随机试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Addressing muscle deficits within a multi-component exercise fall reduction program is a priority, especially for the highest risk older adults, i.e., those who have fallen previously. Eccentric resistance exercise with its high-force producing potential, at a low energetic cost, may be ideally-suited to address muscle impairments in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of resistance exercise via negative, eccentrically-induced, work (RENEW) versus traditional (TRAD) resistance exercise on mobility, balance confidence, muscle power and cross sectional area, as well as the number of days high fall risk older adults survived without a fall event over a 1 year period. Methods Randomized, two group, four time point (over 1 year) clinical trial testing RENEW versus TRAD as part of a 3 month multi-component exercise fall reduction program (MCEFRP). Primary outcomes of mobility, balance confidence, muscle power output and cross sectional area were analyzed using mixed effects modeling. The secondary outcomes of days to fall and days to near-fall were analyzed using survival analysis. Results The MCEFRP did have an effect on fall risk factors considered reversible with exercise interventions though there was no differential effect of RENEW versus TRAD ( p =?0.896) on mobility, balance confidence, muscle power and cross sectional area. There were also no group differences in the number of days survived without a fall ( p =?0.565) or near-fall ( p =?0.678). Despite 100% of participants having at least one fall in the year prior to the MCEFRP, however, after 3?months of exercise and 9?months of follow-up Conclusions There were no differential effects of RENEW or TRAD as components of a MCEFRP on the primary or secondary outcomes. The two modes of resistance exercise had identical effects on fall risk and fall-free survival. Trial registration NCT01080196 ; March 2, 2010 (retrospectively registered).
机译:背景技术在减少多分量运动的跌倒计划中解决肌肉不足是当务之急,尤其是对于高风险的老年人,即以前跌倒的老年人。偏心阻力运动具有产生力量大,潜力低,精力充沛的特点,可能非常适合解决这一人群的肌肉损伤。这项研究的目的是比较通过负偏心诱导锻炼(RENEW)与传统(TRAD)阻力锻炼进行的阻力锻炼对活动性,平衡信心,肌肉力量和横截面积以及数量的影响。高跌倒风险的高龄成年人在1年内没有跌倒事件幸存下来。方法作为3个月多成分运动量减少项目(MCEFRP)的一部分,随机,两组,四个时间点(超过1年)进行RENEW与TRAD的临床试验测试。使用混合效应模型分析了运动性,平衡信心,肌肉力量输出和横截面积的主要结果。使用生存分析分析了跌倒天和接近跌倒天的次要结果。结果MCEFRP确实对运动干预可逆的跌倒危险因素有影响,尽管RENEW和TRAD对运动性,平衡信心,肌肉力量和横截面积没有差异作用(p =?0.896)。没有跌倒(p =?0.565)或接近跌倒(p =?0.678)的存活天数也没有群体差异。尽管有100%的参与者在MCEFRP之前的一年中跌倒了至少一个,但是在运动3个月和9个月的随访后结论结论RENEW或TRAD作为MCEFRP的组成部分并没有差异。主要或次要结果。两种抵抗运动模式对跌倒风险和无跌倒生存的影响相同。试用注册NCT01080196; 2010年3月2日(追溯注册)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号