...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Genetics >Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods
【24h】

Empirical evaluation of humpback whale telomere length estimates; quality control and factors causing variability in the singleplex and multiplex qPCR methods

机译:座头鲸端粒长度估计的实证评估;单重和多重qPCR方法的质量控制和导致变异的因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Telomeres, the protective cap of chromosomes, have emerged as powerful markers of biological age and life history in model and non-model species. The qPCR method for telomere length estimation is one of the most common methods for telomere length estimation, but has received recent critique for being too error-prone and yielding unreliable results. This critique coincides with an increasing awareness of the potentials and limitations of the qPCR technique in general and the proposal of a general set of guidelines (MIQE) for standardization of experimental, analytical, and reporting steps of qPCR. In order to evaluate the utility of the qPCR method for telomere length estimation in non-model species, we carried out four different qPCR assays directed at humpback whale telomeres, and subsequently performed a rigorous quality control to evaluate the performance of each assay. Results Performance differed substantially among assays and only one assay was found useful for telomere length estimation in humpback whales. The most notable factors causing these inter-assay differences were primer design and choice of using singleplex or multiplex assays. Inferred amplification efficiencies differed by up to 40% depending on assay and quantification method, however this variation only affected telomere length estimates in the worst performing assays. Conclusion Our results suggest that seemingly well performing qPCR assays may contain biases that will only be detected by extensive quality control. Moreover, we show that the qPCR method for telomere length estimation can be highly precise and accurate, and thus suitable for telomere measurement in non-model species, if effort is devoted to optimization at all experimental and analytical steps. We conclude by highlighting a set of quality controls which may serve for further standardization of the qPCR method for telomere length estimation, and discuss some of the factors that may cause variation in qPCR experiments.
机译:背景端粒是染色体的保护帽,已经成为模型和非模型物种生物学年龄和生活史的有力标记。用于端粒长度估计的qPCR方法是最常见的端粒长度估计方法之一,但最近因其容易出错和产生不可靠的结果而受到批评。这种批评与人们对qPCR技术的潜力和局限性的认识不断提高,以及对qPCR实验,分析和报告步骤标准化的通用指南(MIQE)的提议相吻合。为了评估qPCR方法在非模型物种中端粒长度估计中的实用性,我们针对座头鲸端粒进行了四种不同的qPCR测定,随后进行了严格的质量控制,以评估每种测定的性能。结果分析之间的性能差异很大,仅发现一种分析可用于座头鲸的端粒长度估计。引起这些测定间差异的最显着因素是引物设计和使用单重或多重测定的选择。根据测定和定量方法,推断的扩增效率相差高达40%,但是,这种变化仅影响性能最差的测定中端粒长度的估计。结论我们的结果表明,看似表现良好的qPCR分析可能包含偏倚,只有通过广泛的质量控制才能检测到。此外,我们表明,如果致力于所有实验和分析步骤的优化,用于端粒长度估计的qPCR方法可以非常精确和准确,因此适用于非模型物种的端粒测量。最后,我们着重介绍了一套可用于进一步量化端粒长度估计的qPCR方法的质量控制方法,并讨论了可能引起qPCR实验变异的一些因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号