首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Comparison of sedation between the endoscopy room and operation room during endoscopic submucosal dissection for neoplasms in the upper gastrointestinal tract
【24h】

Comparison of sedation between the endoscopy room and operation room during endoscopic submucosal dissection for neoplasms in the upper gastrointestinal tract

机译:内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗上消化道肿瘤时内镜室与手术室镇静的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The present study was performed to compare the safety of sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the endoscopy room versus operation room. In total, 297 patients with gastrointestinal tumors who underwent ESD from January 2011 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent ESD in the endoscopy room without propofol (Group E) versus operation room with propofol (Group O). The patient, tumor, and procedure characteristics; adverse events; and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. The patient and tumor characteristics, including age (73.6?±?8.2 vs. 72.5?±?9.1?years), comorbidities, and tumor size and histology, were not different between Groups E and O. The ESD procedure time was comparable between Groups E and O (105.4?±?70.4 vs. 106.5?±?64.4?min), and the anesthesia time was equivalent (138.3?±?78.1 vs. 148.4?±?68.8?min). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. During the ESD procedure, desaturation occurred significantly more often in Group E than O (12.9% vs. 4.0%, P?=?0.021, odds ratio: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.17–14.4). The recovery time after ESD was significantly longer in Group E than O (180 (100–360) vs. 90 (0–180) min, P?
机译:本研究的目的是比较内镜室和手术室内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)期间镇静的安全性。回顾性分析了2011年1月至2016年12月接受ESD治疗的297例胃肠道肿瘤患者。将患者分为两组:在无丙泊酚的内窥镜室(E组)和有丙泊酚的手术室(O组)进行ESD的患者。患者,肿瘤和手术特点;不良事件;并比较两组的治疗结果。 E组和O组之间的患者和肿瘤特征,包括年龄(73.6±8.2)岁与72.5±9.1岁(年龄),合并症,肿瘤大小和组织学无差异。ESD手术时间在各组之间可比E和O(105.4±±70.4 vs.106.5±±64.4μmin),而麻醉时间相同(138.3±±78.1与148.4±±68.8μmin)。两组之间的不良事件没有显着差异。在ESD程序中,E组中的去饱和发生率明显高于O组(12.9%对4.0%,P≥0.021,优势比:3.53,95%CI:1.17-14.4)。 E组ESD后的恢复时间明显长于O(180(100–360)分钟,而90(0–180)分钟,P 0.001)。与内窥镜检查室中的镇静相比,丙泊酚在手术室中的镇静优势在于降低的去饱和率和ESD后的恢复时间更短。这些发现值得进一步探讨手术室中上消化道肿瘤安全有效的ESD的优势。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号