首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Residual effects of muscle strength and muscle power training and detraining on physical function in community-dwelling prefrail older adults: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Residual effects of muscle strength and muscle power training and detraining on physical function in community-dwelling prefrail older adults: a randomized controlled trial

机译:肌肉力量和肌肉力量训练及减损对社区居住的弱体老年人的身体功能的残留影响:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Although resistance exercise interventions have been shown to be beneficial in prefrail or frail older adults it remains unclear whether there are residual effects when the training is followed by a period of detraining. The aim of this study was to establish the sustainability of a muscle power or muscle strength training effect in prefrail older adults following training and detraining. Methods 69 prefrail community-dwelling older adults, aged 65–94 years were randomly assigned into three groups: muscle strength training (ST), muscle power training (PT) or controls. The exercise interventions were performed for 60 minutes, twice a week over 12 weeks. Physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery=SPPB), muscle power (sit-to-stand transfer=STS), self-reported function (SF-LLFDI) and appendicular lean mass (aLM) were measured at baseline and at 12, 24 and 36 weeks after the start of the intervention. Results For the SPPB, significant intervention effects were found at 12 weeks in both exercise groups (ST: p = 0.0047; PT: p = 0.0043). There were no statistically significant effects at 24 and 36 weeks. In the ST group, the SPPB declined continuously after stop of exercising whereas the PT group and controls remained unchanged. No effects were found for muscle power, SF-LLFDI and aLM. Conclusions The results showed that both intervention types are equally effective at 12 weeks but did not result in statistically significant residual effects when the training is followed by a period of detraining. The unchanged SPPB score at 24 and 36 weeks in the PT group indicates that muscle power training might be more beneficial than muscle strength training. However, more research is needed on the residual effects of both interventions. Taken the drop-out rates (PT: 33%, ST: 21%) into account, muscle power training should also be used more carefully in prefrail older adults. Trial registration This trial has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00783159)
机译:背景技术尽管已经证明阻力锻炼干预对体弱者或体弱的老年人是有益的,但尚不清楚在训练后进行一段时间的训练后是否会产生残余效果。这项研究的目的是建立在训练和减训练后的体弱的老年人中,肌肉力量或肌肉力量训练作用的可持续性。方法将69例年龄在65-94岁之间的弱体前社区老年人随机分为三组:肌肉力量训练(ST),肌肉力量训练(PT)或对照组。运动干预进行了60分钟,每周两次,持续12周。在基线时以及在12、24和干预开始后36周。结果对于SPPB,两个运动组在第12周均发现了明显的干预效果(ST:p = 0.0047; PT:p = 0.0043)。在第24周和第36周时,无统计学意义的影响。在ST组,停止运动后SPPB持续下降,而PT组和对照组保持不变。没有发现肌肉力量,SF-LLFDI和aLM的影响。结论结果表明,两种训练类型在12周时都同样有效,但是在训练后进行一段时间的训练后并没有产生统计学上的显着残余效果。 PT组在第24和36周时SPPB得分不变,表明肌肉力量训练可能比肌肉力量训练更有益。但是,需要对这两种干预措施的残余效应进行更多的研究。考虑到辍学率(PT:33%,ST:21%),在体弱的成年人中也应更仔细地使用肌肉力量训练。试验注册该试验已在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT00783159)上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号