...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >The use of pure and impure placebo interventions in primary care - a qualitative approach
【24h】

The use of pure and impure placebo interventions in primary care - a qualitative approach

机译:在初级保健中使用纯净和不纯的安慰剂干预措施-一种定性方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Placebos play an important role in clinical trials and several surveys have shown that they are also common in daily practice. Previous research focused primarily on the frequency of placebo use in outpatient care. Our aim was to explore physicians' views on the use of placebos in daily practice, whereby distinction was made between pure placebos (substances with no pharmacological effect, e.g. sugar pills) and impure placebos (substances with pharmacological effect but not on the condition being treated, e.g. antibiotics in viral infections or vitamins). Methods We performed semi-structured interviews with a sample of twelve primary care physicians (PCPs). The interview addressed individual definitions of a placebo, attitudes towards placebos and the participants' reasons for prescribing them. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The definition of a placebo given by the majority of the PCPs in our study was one which actually only describes pure placebos. This definition, combined with the fact that most impure placebos were not regarded as placebos at all, means that most of the participating PCPs were not aware of the extent to which placebos are used in daily practice. The PCPs stated that they use placebos (both pure and impure) mainly in the case of non-severe diseases for which there was often no satisfactory somatic explanation. According to the PCPs, cases like this are often treated by complementary and alternative therapies and these, too, are associated with placebo effects. However, all PCPs felt that the ethical aspects of such treatment were unclear and they were unsure as to how to communicate the use of placebos to their patients. Most of them would appreciate ethical guidelines on how to deal with this issue. Conclusions Many PCPs seem to be unaware that some of the drugs they prescribe are classified as impure placebos. Perceptions of effectiveness and doubts about the legal and ethical aspects of the use of placebos by PCPs may discourage their application. Dissemination of guidelines and consensus papers may be one approach, but it has to be acknowledged that the topic itself is in conflict with the PCPs' perception of themselves as professional and reliable physicians.
机译:背景技术安慰剂在临床试验中起着重要的作用,多项调查显示它们在日常实践中也很常见。先前的研究主要集中在门诊护理中使用安慰剂的频率。我们的目的是探讨医师对日常使用安慰剂的看法,从而区分纯安慰剂(无药理作用的物质,例如糖丸)和不纯的安慰剂(具有药理作用的物质,但不适用于所治疗的疾病) ,例如病毒感染或维生素中的抗生素)。方法我们对十二位初级保健医生(PCP)进行了抽样,进行了半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了安慰剂的个人定义,对安慰剂的态度以及参与者开具处方的理由。访谈被转录并使用定性内容分析法进行分析。结果在我们的研究中,大多数PCP对安慰剂的定义实际上只是描述了纯安慰剂。这个定义,加上大多数不纯的安慰剂根本不被视为安慰剂的事实,意味着大多数参与PCP者都不知道在日常实践中使用安慰剂的程度。 PCP指出,他们主要在非严重疾病的情况下使用安慰剂(纯和不纯的),而对于这些疾病通常没有令人满意的躯体解释。根据PCP的说法,此类病例通常通过补充和替代疗法进行治疗,并且这些疗法也与安慰剂作用相关。但是,所有PCP人士都认为这种治疗的道德方面尚不明确,也不确定如何向患者传达使用安慰剂的情况。他们中的大多数人会欣赏有关如何处理此问题的道德准则。结论许多PCP似乎没有意识到他们开出的某些药物被归类为不纯的安慰剂。对五氯苯酚使用安慰剂的法律效力和道德方面的有效性的认识和怀疑可能会阻止其应用。传播准则和共识文件可能是一种方法,但必须承认,该主题本身与PCP认为自己是专业且可靠的医生相抵触。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号