...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Comparison of argon plasma coagulation in management of upper gastrointestinal angiodysplasia and gastric antral vascular ectasia hemorrhage
【24h】

Comparison of argon plasma coagulation in management of upper gastrointestinal angiodysplasia and gastric antral vascular ectasia hemorrhage

机译:氩气血浆凝结治疗上消化道血管增生和胃窦血管扩张性出血的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Vascular ectasias, including gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) and angiodysplasia, are increasingly recognized as important sources of gastrointestinal bleeding. This study investigated and compared the efficacies and outcomes of treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) angiodysplasia and GAVE hemorrhage by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC). Methods From January 2006 to December 2009, 46 patients diagnosed with upper GI bleeding caused by angiodysplasia or GAVE at a tertiary hospital were recruited into this study. They included 26 males and 20 females with an average age of 65.6?years (range, 45–90?years). All patients underwent APC for hemostasis during an endoscopic procedure. Parameters such as underlying co-morbidities, number of endoscopic treatment sessions, recurrent bleeding, and clinical outcomes during follow-up were analyzed. Results The 46 patients with UGI vascular ectasia hemorrhage included 27 patients with angiodysplasia and 19 with GAVE. The patients with angiodysplasia were older than those with GAVE (71.6?±?10.2?years versus 61.8?±?11.9?years, P?=?0.005). More GAVE patients than angiodysplasia patients had co-existing liver cirrhosis (63.2% versus 25.9%, P?=?0.012). The patients with GAVE had a higher rate of recurrent bleeding (78.9% versus 7.4%, P?P?P?=?0.003), GAVE (OR?=?0.021, P?P?=?0.032) were associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding. Further multivariate analysis revealed that GAVE was the only independent risk factor for recurrent bleeding after APC treatment (OR?=?0.027, P? Conclusion Endoscopic hemostasis with APC is a safe treatment modality for both angiodysplasia and vascular ectasia bleeding. The efficacy of APC treatment is greater for angiodysplasia than for vascular ectasia bleeding. GAVE patients have a higher recurrent bleeding rate and may require multiple treatment sessions for sustained hemostasis.
机译:背景技术包括胃窦血管扩张(GAVE)和血管增生在内的血管扩张已被认为是胃肠道出血的重要来源。这项研究调查并比较了内镜下氩气血浆凝集(APC)治疗上消化道(UGI)血管增生和GAVE出血的疗效和结果。方法2006年1月至2009年12月,在三级医院就诊的46例由血管增生或GAVE引起的上消化道大出血的患者入选本研究。他们包括26名男性和20名女性,平均年龄为65.6岁(45-90岁)。在内窥镜检查过程中,所有患者均接受了APC止血。分析了诸如潜在合并症,内窥镜治疗疗程数,复发性出血以及随访期间的临床结果等参数。结果46例UGI血管扩张性出血患者包括27例血管增生和19例GAVE。血管增生的患者比GAVE的患者年龄大(71.6±10。2年)对61.8±11。9年(P = 0.005)。并发肝硬化的GAVE患者多于血管增生患者(63.2%对25.9%,P = 0.012)。 GAVE患者的复发出血发生率较高(78.9%vs 7.4%,P?P?P?=?0.003),GAVE(OR?=?0.021,P?P?=?0.032)与更高的发生率相关反复出血。进一步的多变量分析表明,GAVE是APC​​治疗后复发出血的唯一独立危险因素(OR?=?0.027,P?)结论APC内镜止血是血管增生和血管扩张的一种安全治疗方法。 GAVE患者的复发出血率更高,可能需要多次治疗才能持续止血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号