...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ophthalmology >Small-incision phacotrabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification in refractory acute primary angle closure with cataract
【24h】

Small-incision phacotrabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification in refractory acute primary angle closure with cataract

机译:小切口晶状体小梁切除术与超声乳化白内障难治性急性原发性闭角

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Acute primary angle closure (PAC) can be refractory to conventional treatment and intraocular pressure (IOP) is beyond control. Surgical intervention should be considered at the moment. The aim of the study was to compare small-incision phacotrabeculectomy (phacotrab, small-incision trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification) with phacoemulsification (phaco) in patients with refractory acute PAC and coexisting cataract. Methods Analyzed 49 eyes (49 patients) with acute PAC and cataract received small-incision phacotrab (24 eyes) or phaco (25 eyes) randomly. All these cases were refractory to conventional treatment involved the use of preoperative topical IOP-lowering agents, corticosteroids, mannitol, methazolamide and paracentesis to reduce IOP. The effects on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, anterior chamber depth (ACD), glaucoma medications, and complications were observed for twelve months. Results After operation BCVA of 18 patients (75 %) in phacotrab group and 20 patients (80 %) in phaco group improved compared to preoperative vision. No statistically significant differences in mean BCVA were found between the two groups. The mean postoperative IOP levels at all follow up time points were lower than the mean preoperative IOP in each group (P P?=?0.006). The surgical success rate (without medications, IOP?≤?21?mmHg) was 83.33 % (20 eyes) and 72 % (18 eyes) in phacotrab group and phaco group respectively at 12?months. No statistically significant differences in the mean ACD were found between the two groups. There were no serious intra- or post-operative complications in the two treatment groups. Conclusions Besides phaco, small incision phacotrab may be another effective and safe choice in the treatment of patients with refractory acute PAC and coexisting cataract. Whether phacotrab is more effective in IOP control in the long term needs to be verified in the further.
机译:背景技术急性原发性闭角(PAC)对常规治疗可能是难治的,并且眼内压(IOP)无法控制。此刻应考虑手术干预。本研究的目的是比较难治性急性PAC和共存白内障患者的小切口超声乳化小梁切除术(经方甲,小切口小梁切除术联合超声乳化术)与超声乳化术(phaco)。方法对49例急性PAC和白内障患者的49眼随机接受小切口乳-(24眼)或白内障(25眼)。所有这些情况均不易接受常规治疗,包括术前使用局部降眼压剂,皮质类固醇,甘露醇,甲唑酰胺和穿刺术以降低眼压。观察了对最佳矫正视力(BCVA),眼压,前房深度(ACD),青光眼药物和并发症的影响,持续了12个月。结果术前phacotrab组18例(75%)和phaco组20例(80%)的BCVA较术前改善。两组之间的平均BCVA没有统计学上的显着差异。所有随访时间点的平均术后IOP水平均低于各组的平均术前IOP(P P = 0.006)。 phacotrab组和phaco组在12个月时的手术成功率(无药物,IOP≤≤21mmHg)分别为83.33%(20眼)和72%(18眼)。两组之间的平均ACD差异无统计学意义。两个治疗组均无严重的术中或术后并发症。结论除phaco外,小切口phacotrab可能是治疗难治性急性PAC并存白内障的另一种安全有效的选择。从长远来看,phacotrab是否在IOP控制方面更有效,还需要进一步验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号