首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Beyond pros and cons – developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development
【24h】

Beyond pros and cons – developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development

机译:利弊之外–开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话以建立关系:定性研究和决策辅助工具开发中的见解

获取原文
           

摘要

An individualized approach using shared decision-making (SDM) and goal setting is a person-centred strategy that may facilitate prioritization of treatment options. SDM has not been adopted extensively in clinical practice. An interprofessional approach to SDM with tools to facilitate patient participation may overcome barriers to SDM use. The aim was to explore decision-making experiences of health professionals and people with diabetes (PwD), then develop an intervention to facilitate interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) and goal-setting. This was a multi-phased study. 1) Feasibility: Using a descriptive qualitative study, individual interviews with primary care physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and PwD were conducted. The interviews explored their experiences with SDM and priority-setting, including facilitators and barriers, relevance of a decision aid for priority-setting, and integration of SDM and a decision aid into practice. 2) Development: An evidence-based SDM toolkit was developed, consisting of an online decision aid, MyDiabetesPlan, and implementation tools. MyDiabetesPlan was reviewed by content experts for accuracy and comprehensiveness. Usability assessment was done with 3) heuristic evaluation and 4) user testing, followed by 5) refinement. Seven PwD and 10 clinicians participated in the interviews. From interviews with PwD, we identified that: (1) approaches to decision-making were diverse and dynamic; (2) a trusting relationship with the clinician and dialog were critical precursors to SDM; and, (3) goal-setting was a dynamic process. From clinicians, we found: (1) complementary (holistic and disease specific) approaches to the complex patient were used; (2) patient-provider agendas for goal-setting were often conflicting; (3) a flexible approach to decision-making was needed; and, (4) conflict could be resolved through SDM. Following usability assessment, we redesigned MyDiabetesPlan to consist of data collection and recommendation stages. Findings were used to finalize a multi-component toolkit and implementation strategy, consisting of MyDiabetesPlan, instructional card and videos, and orientation meetings with participating patients and clinicians. A decision aid can provide information, facilitate clinician-patient dialog and strengthen the therapeutic relationship. Implementation of the decision aid can fit into a model of team care that respects and exemplifies professional identity, and can facilitate intra-team communication. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: 11 February 2015.
机译:使用共享决策(SDM)和目标设定的个性化方法是一种以人为本的策略,可以促进对治疗方案进行优先排序。 SDM在临床实践中尚未得到广泛采用。使用工具促进患者参与的跨行业SDM方法可以克服使用SDM的障碍。目的是探索卫生专业人员和糖尿病患者(PwD)的决策经验,然后制定干预措施,以促进跨行业共享决策(IP-SDM)和目标设定。这是一个多阶段的研究。 1)可行性:使用描述性定性研究,对初级保健医生,护士,营养师,药剂师和PwD进行了个人访谈。访谈探讨了他们在SDM和优先级设置方面的经验,包括促进者和障碍,决策协助与优先级设置的相关性以及SDM和决策辅助在实践中的应用。 2)开发:开发了基于证据的SDM工具包,包括在线决策辅助工具,MyDiabetesPlan和实施工具。内容专家对MyDiabetesPlan进行了准确性和全面性审查。可用性评估是通过3)启发式评估和4)用户测试,然后是5)完善来进行的。七名残疾人士和十名临床医生参加了访谈。通过对残疾人的采访,我们发现:(1)决策方法是多样且动态的; (2)与临床医生的信任关系和对话是SDM的重要先驱; (3)设定目标是一个动态的过程。从临床医生那里,我们发现:(1)使用了针对复杂患者的互补(整体和特定疾病)方法; (2)设定目标的患者提供者议程经常相互矛盾; (3)需要灵活的决策方法; (4)可以通过SDM解决冲突。在可用性评估之后,我们重新设计了MyDiabetesPlan,以包括数据收集和推荐阶段。调查结果用于最终确定多组件工具包和实施策略,包括MyDiabetesPlan,指导卡和视频以及与参与患者和临床医生的情况介绍会。决策辅助工具可以提供信息,促进临床医生与患者之间的对话并加强治疗关系。决策辅助的实施可以适合于团队护理的模型,该模型应尊重并举例说明专业人士的身份,并可以促进团队内部的沟通。 Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT02379078。注册日期:2015年2月11日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号