首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nursing >Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology
【24h】

Unsafe clinical practices as perceived by final year baccalaureate nursing students: Q methodology

机译:最终学士学位的护理学生认为不安全的临床实践:Q方法论

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students, patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment. Methods Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted 43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Q-analysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints yielding discrete and consensus perspectives. Results A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus perspective, labelled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Non-patient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second site. Conclusions Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patient-centered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in the clinical learning environment. In an effort to eradicate compromised safety associated with learning in the clinical milieu, students and educators must embody the ontological, epistemological and praxis fundamentals of nursing.
机译:背景技术护理教育需要对临床安全性保持警惕,鉴于学生,患者和教育者之间的复杂交流,这是一个艰巨的挑战。作为积极的学习者,学生们对实践环境中的安全性有主观的理解,值得进一步研究。这项研究描述了临床护理环境中高级护理专业学生对安全性受损的观点。方法使用Q方法从加拿大安大略省多个地点提供的学士学位护理计划的高年级学生的角度系统地得出关于不安全临床学习的多种观点。在两个计划站点中,有59名四年级学生对43张理论陈述卡进行了分类,描述了不安全的临床实践。 Q分析确定了参与者观点之间的异同,从而产生了离散观点和共识观点。结果总共确定了六个离散观点和两个共识观点。在一个站点上,离散的观点是对非关键性知识转移的认可,非学生为中心的计划以及临床表现不令人满意的明显模式。此外,在该地点,被标记为“违规做法”的共识观点被认为是造成临床安全性受损的原因。在另一个站点,离散的观点是过早和不适当的临床进展,非患者中心实践以及否定有目的的体验学习互动。大家一致认为,从第二个站点的学生的角度来看,腐蚀公约损害了临床安全性。结论高级护理专业学生认为,缺乏知识,以患者为中心的实践,专业道德和真实性威胁着临床学习环境的安全。为了消除与临床环境中的学习相关的折衷安全性,学生和教育工作者必须体现护理的本体论,认识论和实践基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号