...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Imaging >Effect of region of interest on ADC and interobserver variability in thyroid nodules
【24h】

Effect of region of interest on ADC and interobserver variability in thyroid nodules

机译:感兴趣区域对甲状腺结节ADC和观察者间变异的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To determine the effect of region of interest (ROI) on tumor’s apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and interobserver variability in thyroid nodules. Thirty-three individuals with 45 pathologically-confirmed thyroid nodules were assessed by preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with b values of 0 and 400?s/mm2, respectively. Two readers evaluated the ADC values of lesions based on three ROI techniques: whole-volume, single-slice and small solid-sample groups. Interobserver variability was analyzed for all ROI techniques, and the mean ADCs of benign and cancerous thyroid nodules were compared. For the mean ADCs of non-cancerous thyroid nodules, average differences and limits of agreement (LOAs) between readers were 0.00 [??0.17–0.17]?×?10??3?mm2/s for whole-volume ROI (ICC?=?0.967), 0.00 [??0.26–0.26]?×?10??3?mm2/s for single-slice ROI (ICC?=?0.932) and???0.02 [??0.38–0.41]?×?10??3?mm2/s for small solid-sample ROI (ICC?=?0.823). For the mean ADCs of cancerous thyroid nodules, average differences and LOAs between readers were???0.05 [??0.23–0.13]?×?10??3?mm2/s (ICC?=?0.885), 0.01 [??0.23–0.25]?×?10??3?mm2/s (ICC?=?0.839) and???0.07 [??0.52–0.39]?×?10??3?mm2/s (ICC?=?0.579) for the three ROI methods, respectively. The mean ADC values were more scattered in the small solid-sample ROI group in comparison with the whole-volume and single-slice groups, in noncancerous and cancerous specimens. Of all three ROI techniques, whole-volume ROI-determined ADC had the highest combined sensitivity (80.0%), specificity (88.3%) and Youden index (0.683), with a cut-off of 1.84?×?10??3?mm2/s. The ROI method overtly affects ADC measurements in benign and cancerous thyroid nodules. Small solid-sample ROI yielded the worst interobserver variability of average ADC measurements.
机译:为了确定目标区域(ROI)对甲状腺结节中肿瘤的表观扩散系数(ADC)和观察者间变异性的影响。通过术前弥散加权成像(DWI)评估b值为0和400?s / mm2的33例经病理证实的甲状腺结节的个体。两名读者根据三种ROI技术评估了病变的ADC值:整批,单切片和小样本组。分析了所有ROI技术的观察者间差异,并比较了良性和癌性甲状腺结节的平均ADC。对于非癌性甲状腺结节的平均ADC,读者之间的平均差异和一致限(LOA)为0.00 [?? 0.17–0.17]××?10 ?? 3?mm2 / s(按全体积ROI(ICC? == 0.967),0.00 [?0.26-0.26]?×?10?3?mm2 / s(单层ROI)(ICC?=?0.932)和0.02 [?0.38-0.41]?×对于小的固体样品ROI(ICCα= 0.823),为10λ3平方毫米/秒。对于甲状腺癌结节的平均ADC,读者之间的平均差异和LOA为0.05 [?? 0.23-0.13]?×?10?3?mm2 / s(ICC?=?0.885),0.01 [?]。 0.23〜0.25]××10 10 3平方毫米/秒(ICC = 0.893)和0.07 [Δ0.52-0.39]××10 10 3平方毫米/秒(ICC =α= 0.23)。 0.579)分别用于三种ROI方法。在非癌和癌标本中,与总体积和单切片组相比,小型固体样品ROI组中的ADC平均值更分散。在所有三种ROI技术中,由整体ROI确定的ADC具有最高的组合灵敏度(80.0%),特异性(88.3%)和Youden指数(0.683),截止值为1.84?×?10?3?。平方毫米/秒ROI方法明显影响良性和癌性甲状腺结节中ADC的测量。较小的固体样品ROI产生的平均ADC测量值的观察者间差异最大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号