首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Imaging >Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) compared with conventional ultrasound for evaluating thyroid nodules
【24h】

Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) compared with conventional ultrasound for evaluating thyroid nodules

机译:与常规超声相比,超微血管成像(SMI)评估甲状腺结节

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) for depiction of microvascular flow in thyroid nodules was compared with color/power Doppler imaging (CDI/PDI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). In addition, the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound combined with SMI for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules was evaluated. Preoperative conventional ultrasound consisting of gray-scale ultrasonography and CDI/PDI, followed by SMI and CEUS, was used to record?52 thyroid nodules. Two radiologists analyzed the gray-scale ultrasound signs and nodules’ microvascular flow patterns to differentiate between benign (n?=?13) and malignant nodules (n?=?39). SMI was significantly more effective in the detection of microvascular flow signals than CDI/PDI. In malignant nodules, SMI depicted the presence of incomplete surrounding periphery microvasculature and of disordered heterogeneous internal microvasculature. Benign nodules showed complete surrounding periphery microvasculature (ring sign) and homogeneity internal branching. The accuracies of conventional ultrasound combined with CDI/ PDI, SMI, or CEUS for predicting malignancy were 67.31, 86.54, and 92.31%, respectively. The accuracy of SMI differed significantly from CDI/PDI (P?=?0.012), but not from CEUS (P?=?0.339). Microvascular flow and vessel branching in the peripheral and internal microvasculature of thyroid nodules is depicted with greater detail and clarity with SMI compared with conventional ultrasound. SMI offers a safe and low-cost alternative to CEUS for differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
机译:比较了用于描述甲状腺结节中微血管流动的出色微血管成像(SMI)与彩色/功率多普勒成像(CDI / PDI)和对比增强超声(CEUS)。此外,还评估了常规超声结合SMI对甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断性能。术前常规超声由灰阶超声和CDI / PDI组成,然后使用SMI和CEUS来记录52个甲状腺结节。两位放射科医生分析了灰度超声征象和结节的微血管流动模式,以区分良性结节(n = 13)和恶性结节(n = 39)。 SMI在检测微血管流量信号方面比CDI / PDI显着更有效。在恶性结节中,SMI描绘了周围外周微血管不完整和异质性内部微血管紊乱的存在。良性结节显示出完整的周围微血管周围(环状体征)和同质性内部分支。传统超声结合CDI / PDI,SMI或CEUS预测恶性肿瘤的准确性分别为67.31%,86.54%和92.31%。 SMI的准确性与CDI / PDI有显着差异(P <= 0.012),而与CEUS的准确性无差异(P = 0.339)。与传统超声相比,使用SMI可以更详细,清晰地描述甲状腺结节周围和内部微血管中的微血管流动和血管分支。 SMI为区分良性和恶性甲状腺结节提供了一种安全,低成本的CEUS替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号