首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Imaging >Agreement of left ventricular mass in steady state free precession and delayed enhancement MR images: implications for quantification of fibrosis in congenital and ischemic heart disease
【24h】

Agreement of left ventricular mass in steady state free precession and delayed enhancement MR images: implications for quantification of fibrosis in congenital and ischemic heart disease

机译:稳态无进动和延迟增强MR图像中左心室肿块的一致性:对先天性和缺血性心脏病中纤维化定量的意义

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Left ventricular mass (LVM) is used when expressing infarct or fibrosis as a percentage of the left ventricle (LV). Quantification of LVM is interchangeably carried out in cine steady state free precession (SSFP) and delayed enhancement (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these techniques may yield different LVM. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare LVM determined by SSFP and DE MRI in patients and determine the agreement with these sequences with ex vivo data in an experimental animal model. Methods Ethics committees approved human and animal studies. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients. SSFP and DE images were acquired in 60 patients (20 with infarction, 20 without infarction and 20 pediatric patients). Ex vivo MRI was used as reference method for LVM in 19 pigs and compared to in vivo SSFP and DE. Results LVM was greater in SSFP than in DE (p 2 = 0.98), and a bias of 7.3 ± 6.7% (p 2 = 0.83). Bias for SSFP and DE images compared to ex vivo LVM was -0.2 ± 9.0% and -7.7 ± 8.5% respectively. Conclusions LVM was higher when measured with SSFP compared to DE. Thus, the percentage infarction of the LV will differ if SSFP or DE is used to determine LVM. There was no significant difference between SSFP and ex vivo LVM suggesting that SSFP is more accurate for LVM quantification. To avoid intrinsic error due to the differences between the sequences, we suggest using DE when expressing infarct as a percentage of LVM.
机译:背景技术当表达梗塞或纤维化占左心室(LV)的百分比时,使用左心室质量(LVM)。 LVM的定量可在电影稳态无旋进(SSFP)和延迟增强(DE)磁共振成像(MRI)中互换进行。但是,这些技术可能会产生不同的LVM。因此,该研究的目的是比较由SSFP和DE MRI测定的患者LVM,并在实验动物模型中确定与这些序列与离体数据的一致性。方法伦理委员会批准了人类和动物研究。所有患者均获得知情的书面同意。在60例患者(20例有梗塞,20例无梗塞和20例儿科患者)中获取了SSFP和DE图像。将离体MRI用作19头猪LVM的参考方法,并与体内SSFP和DE进行了比较。结果SSFP中的LVM大于DE中的LVM(p 2 = 0.98),偏差为7.3±6.7%(p 2 = 0.83)。与离体LVM相比,SSFP和DE图像的偏差分别为-0.2±9.0%和-7.7±8.5%。结论与DE相比,使用SSFP进行测量时LVM更高。因此,如果使用SSFP或DE确定LVM,则LV的梗死百分比将有所不同。 SSFP和离体LVM之间没有显着差异,表明SSFP对于LVM定量更准确。为了避免由于序列之间的差异而导致的内在错误,我们建议在表达梗塞时使用DE作为LVM的百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号