首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
【24h】

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model

机译:如何在床边引入医学伦理学-影响伦理决策模型实施的因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Background As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field. Methods A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used. Results Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary. Conclusions Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort.
机译:背景技术由于新的医学伦理学方法和程序的实施与其他领域一样复杂且消耗资源,因此必须仔细计划策略和活动,以负责任地使用可用的手段和资金。哪些促进因素和障碍会影响日常医疗伦理决策模型的实施?迄今为止,在该领域中几乎没有检查这些因素。方法在三个重症监护病房和两个老年病房引入了称为METAP的医学伦理决策模型。从项目部署后的7个月到两年半进行了评估研究。使用定量和定性方法,包括问卷,半结构化面对面访谈和小组访谈。结果来自不同专业组的63名参与者参加了33次面对面的访谈和9次小组访谈,可以分析122份问卷。最经常提及的促进因素是:模型的接受和存在,医疗和护理管理层的支持,现有或正在发展的(明确的)道德文化,对医学伦理决策模型的需要的认识以及敬业的员工成员。缺乏存在感和接受感,时间资源和人员不足,专业间的合作不佳,缺乏道德能力以及对道德问题的认识不足,都阻碍了METAP模型的实施。但是,问卷调查和明确查询的结果表明,受访者表示有足够的​​时间和必要的人员来使用METAP。结论实施医学伦理决策模型的促进因素和障碍与医学指南非常相似。因此,实施道德规范模型或指南的计划可受益于有关实施医学指南的大量文献和经验。当人们确信这些好处证明了付出的努力是合理的时,可以节省时间和人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号