首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Comparison of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of 574 patients
【24h】

Comparison of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of 574 patients

机译:辅助化疗和新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的比较:574例患者的回顾性研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background There is a lack of clinical data on the validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens on the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 574 patients with advanced ovarian cancer admitted to four Lithuanian oncogynaecology departments during 1993–2000. The conventional combined treatment of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy was applied to both the group that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 213) and to the control group (n = 361). The selection criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was large extent of the disease. Overall and progression-free survival rates and survival medians were calculated using life tables and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results There was no difference in median overall survival between stage III patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (25.9 months vs . 29.3 months, p = 0.2508) and stage IV patients (15.4 months vs . 14.9 months, p = 0.6108). Similarly, there was no difference in median progression-free survival between stage III patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15.7 months vs . 17.5 months, p = 0.1299) and stage IV patients (8.7 months vs . 8.2 months, p = 0.1817). There was no difference in the rate of the optimal cytoreductive surgery between patients who underwent the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients primarily treated with surgery (n = 134, 63% vs . n = 242, 67%, respectively). Conclusion There was no difference in progression-free or overall survival and in the rate of optimal cytoreductive surgery between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy groups despite the fact that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a more extensive disease. Multivariate analysis failed to prove that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be considered as an independent prognostic factor for survival, and the findings need to be investigated in the future prospective randomised studies.
机译:背景缺乏关于新辅助化疗在卵巢癌治疗中有效性的临床数据。这项研究的目的是比较晚期卵巢癌患者的辅助化疗和新辅助化疗方案对临床结局的影响。方法我们回顾性分析了1993-2000年在立陶宛四个妇产科就诊的574例晚期卵巢癌患者。细胞减灭术和铂类化学疗法的常规联合治疗适用于接受新辅助化疗的组(n = 213)和对照组(n = 361)。新辅助化疗的选择标准在很大程度上取决于疾病。使用生命表和Kaplan-Meier方法计算总体和无进展生存率以及生存中位数。结果在接受辅助化疗和新辅助化疗的III期患者(25.9个月vs. 29.3个月,p = 0.2508)和IV期患者(15.4个月vs. 14.9个月,p = 0.6108)之间,中位总生存期无差异。同样,接受辅助化疗和新辅助化疗的III期患者(15.7个月vs. 17.5个月,p = 0.1299)与IV期患者(8.7个月vs. 8.2个月,p = 0.1817)之间的无进展生存期中位数无差异。 )。接受新辅助化疗的患者与主要接受手术治疗的患者之间的最佳减细胞手术率没有差异(分别为134%,63%和242%,67%)。结论尽管新辅助化疗患者的病情更为广泛,但新辅助化疗组与无辅助化疗组的无进展生存期或总生存期以及最佳细胞减灭术的率均无差异。多因素分析未能证明新辅助化疗可以被视为生存的独立预后因素,因此需要在未来的前瞻性随机研究中对研究结果进行调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号