...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Cost-effectiveness analysis of XELOX versus XELOX plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in a public hospital school
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of XELOX versus XELOX plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in a public hospital school

机译:XELOX与XELOX联合贝伐单抗治疗公立医院转移性结直肠癌的成本效益分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Metastatic colorectal cancer imposes a substantial burden on patients and society. Over the last years, progresses in the treatment have been made especially due to the introduction of monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab which, on the other hand, has considerably increased the costs of treatment. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab plus XELOX in comparison with XELOX alone in metastatic colorectal cancer in first-line therapy, from the perspective of a public hospital school in Brazil. This was a cost-effectiveness analysis performed by a decision tree and Markov models. Costs were expressed in local currency and outcomes were expressed in months of life gained. The model was constructed using the TreeAge Pro 2013? software. The incremental difference in years of life gained was 2.25?months, with an extra cost of 47,833.57 BRL, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness of 21,231.43 BRL per month of life gained. Although the XELOX plus bevacizumab regimen is a more expensive and more effective treatment than XELOX, it does not fit the reimbursement values fixed by the public healthcare system in Brazil.
机译:转移性结直肠癌给患者和社会带来了沉重负担。在过去的几年中,治疗方面取得了进展,特别是由于引入了单克隆抗体,例如贝伐单抗,这反而大大增加了治疗费用。从巴西一所公立医院学校的角度,我们对一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者进行了贝伐单抗联合XELOX与单独使用XELOX的成本效益分析。这是由决策树和马尔可夫模型执行的成本效益分析。成本以当地货币表示,结果以生命的几个月表示。该模型是使用TreeAge Pro 2013构建的?软件。获得的生命年的增量差异为2.25个月,额外成本为47,833.57 BRL,因此,获得的生命周期成本效益为21,231.43 BRL。尽管XELOX加贝伐单抗方案比XELOX更昂贵,更有效,但它不符合巴西公共医疗体系确定的报销价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号