首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >DARS: a phase III randomised multicentre study of dysphagia- optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity- modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT) in head and neck cancer
【24h】

DARS: a phase III randomised multicentre study of dysphagia- optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity- modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT) in head and neck cancer

机译:DARS:头颈癌吞咽困难优化调强放疗(Do-IMRT)与标准调强放疗(S-IMRT)的III期随机多中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Persistent dysphagia following primary chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancers can have a devastating impact on patients’ quality of life. Single arm studies have shown that the dosimetric sparing of critical swallowing structures such as the pharyngeal constrictor muscle and supraglottic larynx can translate to better functional outcomes. However, there are no current randomised studies to confirm the benefits of such swallow sparing strategies. The aim of Dysphagia/Aspiration at risk structures (DARS) trial is to determine whether reducing the dose to the pharyngeal constrictors with dysphagia-optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) will lead to an improvement in long- term swallowing function without having any detrimental impact on disease-specific survival outcomes. Methods/design The DARS trial (CRUK/14/014) is a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) for patients undergoing primary (chemo) radiotherapy for T1-4, N0-3, M0 pharyngeal cancers. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either standard IMRT (S-IMRT) or Do-IMRT. Radiotherapy doses will be the same in both groups; however in patients allocated to Do-IMRT, irradiation of the pharyngeal musculature will be reduced by delivering IMRT identifying the pharyngeal muscles as organs at risk. The primary endpoint of the trial is the difference in the mean MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) composite score, a patient-reported outcome, measured at 12?months post radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include prospective and longitudinal evaluation of swallow outcomes incorporating a range of subjective and objective assessments, quality of life measures, loco-regional control and overall survival. Patients and speech and language therapists (SLTs) will both be blinded to treatment allocation arm to minimise outcome-reporting bias. Discussion DARS is the first RCT investigating the effect of swallow sparing strategies on improving long-term swallowing outcomes in pharyngeal cancers. An integral part of the study is the multidimensional approach to swallowing assessment, providing robust data for the standardisation of future swallow outcome measures. A translational sub- study, which may lead to the development of future predictive and prognostic biomarkers, is also planned. Trial registration This study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, ISRCTN25458988 (04/01/2016)
机译:背景头颈部癌的原发化学放疗(CRT)后持续性吞咽困难可能对患者的生活质量造成毁灭性影响。单臂研究表明,关键吞咽结构(如咽缩肌和声门上喉)的剂量学节制可以转化为更好的功能结局。但是,目前尚无随机研究来证实这种保留燕子策略的好处。吞咽困难/高危结构抽吸试验(DARS)的目的是确定吞咽困难的调强放疗(Do-IMRT)减少咽收缩器的剂量是否会导致长期吞咽功能得到改善对特定疾病生存结果的任何不利影响。方法/设计DARS试验(CRUK / 14/014)是III期多中心随机对照试验(RCT),用于接受T1-4,N0-3,M0咽癌原发(化学)放疗的患者。患者将以标准IMRT(S-IMRT)或Do-IMRT进行随机分配(比例为1:1)。两组的放射治疗剂量相同;但是,在接受Do-IMRT治疗的患者中,通过提供IMRT来识别咽部肌肉为高危器官,可以减少咽部肌肉组织的辐射。该试验的主要终点是在患者放疗后12个月测得的MD安德森吞咽困难综合评分(MDADI)综合评分(患者报告的结局)之间的差异。次要终点包括对吞咽结果的前瞻性和纵向评估,包括一系列主观和客观评估,生活质量衡量,局部区域控制和总体生存。患者,言语和语言治疗师(SLT)都将对治疗分配部门不了解,以最大程度地减少结果报告偏倚。讨论DARS是首项研究吞咽策略对改善咽癌长期吞咽结果的影响的RCT。该研究不可或缺的一部分是多维吞咽评估方法,为将来的吞咽结局指标的标准化提供了可靠的数据。还计划进行翻译子研究,这可能会导致将来的预测性和预后性生物标志物的开发。试验注册该研究已在国际标准随机对照试验注册机构ISRCTN25458988中注册(04/01/2016)

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号