首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Power-sharing and democracy promotion in post-civil war peace-building
【24h】

Power-sharing and democracy promotion in post-civil war peace-building

机译:内战后建设和平中的权力共享和民主促进

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why do peace and democracy not often go together in countries emerging from violent civil conflicts? If the promotion of peace and democracy are conflicting objectives, what are the sources of the problem? Based on the conceptual distinction between short-term peace-making and long-term peace-building that incorporates democracy promotion as an essential component, this article argues that peace-making and democracy promotion often constitute a conflictual relationship when external actors impose a particular set of institutional arrangements - namely, power-sharing agreements - in order to end civil war as quickly as possible. The sharing of power between governments and rebels can be effective at reducing the security dilemma and credible commitment problems in the transition from civil war to peace, but it is a short-term solution and a source of the conflict between peace-making and democracy promotion. This is because power-sharing builds wartime divisions into post-war political structures and provides a strong incentive for former warring parties to garner political support primarily from their own constituent groups. The persistence of wartime cleavages tends to lower public confidence in newly established governmental institutions. Thus, power-sharing is likely to function as an institutional barrier to the establishment of democracy in the long run. This article demonstrates the adverse effects of power-sharing on democracy promotion by analysing post-civil war electoral politics and public attitudes toward former warring parties and governmental institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy promotion, power-sharing, peace-making, peace-building, state-building, Bosnia and HerzegovinaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674359
机译:在刚摆脱暴力内战的国家中,为什么和平与民主并不经常并存?如果促进和平与民主是相互矛盾的目标,那么问题的根源是什么?基于将建立民主作为基本组成部分的短期缔造和平与长期缔造和平之间的概念上的区别,本文认为,当外部参与者施加特定的条件时,缔造和平与民主促进往往构成冲突关系。为了尽快结束内战而进行的体制安排,即权力分享协议。政府与叛乱者之间的权力共享可以有效地减少从内战到和平过渡中的安全困境和可信的承诺问题,但这是一个短期解决方案,也是缔造和平与促进民主之间冲突的根源。这是因为权力共享使战时分裂成为战后政治结构,并强烈激励前交战各方主要从其所属组织中获得政治支持。战时分裂的持续存在会降低公众对新成立的政府机构的信心。因此,从长远来看,分享权力很可能会成为建立民主制度的障碍。本文通过分析内战后的选举政治和公众对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那前交战党和政府机构的态度,证明了权力共享对民主促进的不利影响。查看全文下载全文关键词民主促进,权力共享,缔造和平,建设和平,国家建设,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那相关的变量add add_config ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674359

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第3期|p.486-506|共21页
  • 作者

    Jai Kwan Junga*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号