...
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Lost Over Libya: The 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review - An Obituary
【24h】

Lost Over Libya: The 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review - An Obituary

机译:在利比亚迷失:2010年战略防御与安全评论-An告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Immediately after the formation of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government following the May 2010 general election, the conduct of a Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), in line with election manifesto pledges, was announced. This SDSR was published just prior to the Comprehensive Spending Review in October 2010. It was intended to be a fundamental review of Britain's defence and security posture, based on the strategic need established by the 2010 National Security Strategy, rather than another example of the budgetary salami slicing seen in the 1990s and in the revisions to the 1998 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) during the 2000s. The message was clear: the SDSR was distinctive precisely because it was the operational embodiment of the NSS's strategic assessment. However, by the turn of 2011, the SDSR was already being seen as fundamentally flawed by parliamentarians, defence professionals and expert commentators alike.
机译:在2010年5月大选后成立保守党-自由民主党民主党政府之后,立即宣布了符合选举宣言承诺的战略防御与安全审查(SDSR)。该SDSR在2010年10月全面支出审核之前发布。它旨在根据2010年《国家安全战略》确立的战略需求,对英国的国防和安全态势进行基本审查,而不是预算的另一个例子。在1990年代和2000年代对1998战略防御评论(SDR)的修订中看到了萨拉米香肠切片。信息很明确:SDSR之所以与众不同,恰恰是因为它是NSS战略评估的运作体现。但是,到2011年底,议员,国防专业人员和专家评论员都已经将SDSR视为根本缺陷。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Defence Studies》 |2011年第3期|p.420-444|共25页
  • 作者

    ROBERT DOVER; MARK PHYTHIAN;

  • 作者单位

    Loughborough University;

    University of Leicester;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号