首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >The 2015 National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review choices: grand strategy, risk management or opportunism?
【24h】

The 2015 National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review choices: grand strategy, risk management or opportunism?

机译:2015年《国家安全战略》和《战略防御与安全评论》的选择:大战略,风险管理还是机会主义?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In devising the 2015 National Security Strategy (NSS) and Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), British decision-makers have a choice between trying to shape international affairs to be more favourable or instead planning to respond meaningfully to events that arise. The former grand strategic approach appears favoured however, the latter risk management approach remains the basis for work. That the two approaches are incompatible, distinctly dissimilar and would yield markedly different NSS and SDSR outcomes is generally overlooked. Moreover, opportunism, a third viable approach has been neglected. This article evaluates the three approaches, ascertains their principal advantages and weaknesses and outlines three alternative NSSs and SDSRs based on the different approaches.
机译:在制定2015年《国家安全战略》(NSS)和《战略防御与安全评论》(SDSR)时,英国决策者可以选择是试图塑造国际事务以使其更为有利,还是打算对所发生的事件做出有意义的反应。前者的大战略方法似乎受到欢迎,但是后者的风险管理方法仍然是工作的基础。通常忽略这两种方法不兼容,明显不同并且会产生明显不同的NSS和SDSR结果。此外,机会主义是第三种可行的方法。本文对这三种方法进行了评估,确定了它们的主要优点和缺点,并概述了基于不同方法的三种替代NSS和SDSR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号