...
首页> 外文期刊>The data base for advances in information systems >Business Models and Market Mechanisms: Evaluating Efficiencies in Consumer Electronic Markets
【24h】

Business Models and Market Mechanisms: Evaluating Efficiencies in Consumer Electronic Markets

机译:商业模式和市场机制:评估消费电子市场的效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper examines business models utilizing three different market mechanisms on the Internet: direct search, broker, and dealer. Utilizing capital markets and information theory to compare the business models, the research looks at specific market mechanisms instantiated in PriceScan, NetMarket, and Bottom Dollar. The web sites supporting the market structures were also evaluated on trust mechanisms, reputational ratings, information quality, availability, speed, and liquidity. Twenty standard, consumer products offered through these markets were evaluated over a three-month period examining pricing, availability, and speed of response. There were significant differences across the three models. Direct search and broker models had the highest availability and quickest response. Brokers made the greatest use of trust mechanisms. Direct search and dealers offered the greatest liquidity. Information quality was the highest in the dealer, with strong market, price movement, and product information. Lowest overall prices were consistently evident in the direct search. Allocational efficiency was difficult to determine, but an evaluation of the earlier efficiencies suggests that in situations where consistent market availability is not required, overall the direct search model is the most allocationally efficient. In situations requiring immediate market availability, the broker model appears to be the most allocationally efficient with quick response, competitive prices, and good information quality. The paper extends earlier work in business models and market efficiencies by comparing specific instantiations of the models and developing definitions for and a typology of efficiencies based on capital markets theory. In addition, the paper includes technical and qualitative analysis of Web sites supporting the business models.
机译:本文研究了利用Internet上的三种不同市场机制的业务模型:直接搜索,经纪人和经销商。该研究利用资本市场和信息理论来比较商业模型,研究了在PriceScan,NetMarket和Bottom Dollar中实例化的特定市场机制。还评估了支持市场结构的网站的信任机制,声誉评级,信息质量,可用性,速度和流动性。在三个月的时间内对通过这些市场提供的20种标准消费品进行了评估,检查了价格,可用性和响应速度。三种模型之间存在显着差异。直接搜索和代理模型具有最高的可用性和最快的响应。经纪人充分利用了信任机制。直接搜索和经销商提供了最大的流动性。信息质量是经销商中最高的,具有强大的市场,价格变动和产品信息。在直接搜索中始终可以看到最低的总体价格。分配效率很难确定,但是对早期效率的评估表明,在不需要一致的市场可用性的情况下,总体而言,直接搜索模型是分配效率最高的。在需要立即获得市场可用性的情况下,经纪人模型似乎是分配效率最高的,具有快速响应,具有竞争力的价格和良好的信息质量。本文通过比较模型的具体实例并根据资本市场理论开发效率的定义和类型,扩展了业务模型和市场效率方面的早期工作。此外,本文还对支持业务模型的网站进行了技术和定性分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号