...
首页> 外文期刊>Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry >CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration with a flow-rate based method in three flow cytometers with different years in service
【24h】

CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration with a flow-rate based method in three flow cytometers with different years in service

机译:在三种不同使用年限的流式细胞仪中,以流速为基础的CD4 + T淋巴细胞计数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundCD4+ T-lymphocyte count remains the most important surrogate marker for management of HIV patients in resource-poor countries. The standard single-platform (SP) bead-based flow cytometric method for CD4+ testing is expensive; more affordable methods are needed. We evaluated the SP flow-rate-based calibration method for determining CD4+ counts, using three flow cytometers of varying ages.MethodsCD4+ counts from 103 HIV-1 infected Thai patients were determined using a SP flow-rate method in flow cytometers with 2, 12, and 16 years of service. Results were compared to the bead-based method. Correlation and agreement were analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsCounts obtained from the flow-rate approach in each flow cytometer showed strong correlation with the bead-based method (R2 = 0.97, 0.97, and 0.96 for the 2-, 12-, and 16-year-old flow cytometers). The mean biases for the flow-rate approach compared with the bead-based method were +32.4 cells/L (limit of agreement (LOA): -83.0 to +147.8 cells/L), -28.8 cells/L (LOA: -131.6 to +74.1 cells/L), and -27.0 cells/L (LOA: -149.4 to +95.4 cells/L).ConclusionThe flow-rate approach is reliable for determining CD4+ counts. Results do not vary by age of flow cytometer. This approach provides a cost-effective alternative for HIV patient monitoring in resource-poor settings. © 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society
机译:背景在资源匮乏的国家,CD4 + T淋巴细胞计数仍然是管理HIV患者最重要的替代指标。用于CD4 +测试的基于标准单平台(SP)磁珠的流式细胞术方法很昂贵;需要更实惠的方法。我们使用三种不同年龄的流式细胞仪评估了基于SP流速的校准方法以确定CD4 +计数的方法。采用SP流速法在2、12的流式细胞仪中确定了103名泰国HIV-1感染患者的CD4 +计数。以及16年的服务。将结果与基于珠的方法进行比较。使用线性回归和Bland-Altman分析来分析相关性和一致性。结果从每个流式细胞仪中的流速方法获得的计数显示与基于珠子的方法密切相关(对于2-,12,R2 = 0.97、0.97和0.96) -和16岁的流式细胞仪)。与基于珠子的方法相比,流速方法的平均偏差为+32.4细胞/ L(协议极限(LOA):-83.0至+147.8细胞/L)、-28.8细胞/L(LOA:-131.6)至+74.1细胞/ L)和-27.0细胞/ L(LOA:-149.4至+95.4细胞/ L)。结论流速法对于确定CD4 +计数是可靠的。结果不随流式细胞仪的年龄而变化。这种方法为在资源匮乏的环境中监测HIV患者提供了一种经济有效的选择。 ©2008临床细胞计数协会

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry》 |2008年第5期|310-318|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Office for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;

    Office for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;

    Office for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;

    Office for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号