首页> 外文期刊>Customer Needs and Solutions >Measuring the Impact of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Consumption Behavior with Propensity Scoring
【24h】

Measuring the Impact of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program on Consumption Behavior with Propensity Scoring

机译:用倾向评分法衡量有条件现金转移计划对消费行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs are quickly replacing old welfare programs because they help the poorest members of society both on the short and long terms. On the short term, the extra discretionary income provided by these programs help participant families meet their pressing basic needs. On the long term, these cash transfers are conditional on participants engaging in health and education-related activities that directly benefit their children, as an attempt to extract the new generation from the vicious circle of poverty. The impact of CCT programs on their main goals (health, education, and nutrition) has already been widely tested and documented. The main purpose of our current study is to assess the impact of a fully implemented program (Bolsa Familia in Brazil) on consumption behavior. This is important for several reasons. First, CCT programs represent a substantial boost in participants' discretionary income, all funneled into consumption, resulting into a substantial additional demand for certain product categories. Second, critics of CCT programs claim that most of this discretionary income is squandered in superfluous consumption, pushing these poor households into new unsustainable lifestyle. Third, most tests of the impact of CCT programs are based on controlled experiments conducted either before or at the beginning of the program's full implementation. In contrast, our assessment is done after Bolsa Familia has been fully implemented, which required us to design a natural experiment combining propensity scoring with econometric modeling. Based on this natural experiment, we are able to quantify the effect of Bolsa Familia on its participants and also the incremental demand for various product categories generated by this CCT program. Contrary to what detractors of the program claim, we find that most of the extra cash is devoted to essential goods (food, clothing, etc.) rather than superfluous consumption.
机译:有条件现金转移(CCT)计划正在迅速取代旧的福利计划,因为它们在短期和长期上都可以帮助最贫困的社会成员。从短期来看,这些计划提供的额外可支配收入可帮助参加者家庭满足其紧迫的基本需求。从长远来看,这些现金转移的条件是参加者从事直接有益于其子女的健康和教育相关活动,以期从贫困的恶性循环中汲取新生代。 CCT计划对其主要目标(健康,教育和营养)的影响已经得到广泛测试和证明。我们当前研究的主要目的是评估全面实施的计划(巴西的Bolsa Familia)对消费行为的影响。这很重要,原因有几个。首先,CCT计划显着提高了参与者的可支配收入,所有收入都集中在消费中,从而导致对某些产品类别的大量额外需求。其次,对CCT计划的批评者声称,这些可支配收入中的大部分被浪费在了多余的消费上,使这些贫困家庭陷入了新的不可持续的生活方式。第三,对CCT计划的影响的大多数测试都是基于在计划全面实施之前或开始时进行的受控实验。相反,我们的评估是在Bolsa Familia完全实施之后进行的,这要求我们设计一个将倾向评分与计量经济学模型相结合的自然实验。基于此自然实验,我们能够量化Bolsa Familia对参与者的影响,以及该CCT计划生成的各种产品类别的增量需求。与该计划的反对者所主张的相反,我们发现,大多数额外现金专门用于基本商品(食物,衣物等),而不是多余的消费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号