首页> 外文期刊>Culture, Theory and Critique >Intersections or Misdirections? Problematising Crossroads of Memory in the Commemoration of 9/11
【24h】

Intersections or Misdirections? Problematising Crossroads of Memory in the Commemoration of 9/11

机译:交叉路口或方向错误?在纪念9/11时对记忆十字路口提出质疑

获取原文
       

摘要

The turn towards transculturalism engenders a focus on modes of remembrance that conceptualise memory as dialogic and diverse rather than hierarchical and linear. However, this paper expresses concern that this apparent openness will lead to the presumption that all manifestations of ‘multidirectional’ or ‘cosmopolitan’ memory are ethically-oriented, according commemorative practice a transparency that is not always merited. Particularly disquieting are overly analogical memorial endeavours that suggest unproblematic equivalence between historical events, as exemplified by the reliance upon tropes inherited from Holocaust discourse in the public memorial culture of 9/11. This paper analyses the convergence of two pre-existing cultural discourses in the American public sphere after 9/11. The first relates to the ‘Americanization’ of the Holocaust in memorial culture from the early 1990s, which critics have suggested involves a transition from viewing the Holocaust as a historical event to reading it as an affirmative national parable. The second concerns the mobilisation of the Holocaust in support of U.S. military intervention in foreign policy rhetoric in the post-Cold War period. Analysing the intersection of these discourses with the narrative of American exceptionalism, I question whether the prevalence of Holocaust tropes in 9/11's memorial culture suggests a deliberate appropriation of its master narrative of loss. I argue that, in the decade since 9/11, other memorial constellations have been ignored in favour of less problematic acts of historical analogy. Ultimately, I call for greater attention to the potential consequences of applying analogical templates of remembrance without adequate self-reflexivity. I suggest that it is not always the most visible points of connection that offer the potential for ethical modes of remembrance, but the hidden histories, the forgotten memories, whose relationship to 9/11 opens the most important claims to attention.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2012.680261
机译:向跨文化主义的转变使得人们更加关注记忆模式,这种记忆模式将记忆概念化为对话性和多样性,而不是等级性和线性。但是,本文表示关切的是,这种明显的开放性会导致人们推定“多向”或“世界主义”记忆的所有表现形式都是以伦理为导向的,根据纪念实践,这种透明度并不总是值得的。特别令人不安的是过于类比的纪念活动,表明历史事件之间毫无问题的对等,例如在9/11的公共纪念文化中对大屠杀话语的继承比喻就证明了这一点。本文分析了9/11之后美国公共领域中两种先前存在的文化话语的融合。第一个与1990年代初期大屠杀在纪念文化中的“美国化”有关,批评者认为这涉及从将大屠杀视为历史事件到将其视为肯定的国家寓言的转变。第二个问题是动员大屠杀支持冷战后美国对外交政策言论的军事干预。通过分析这些话语与美国例外主义叙事的交汇点,我质疑9/11纪念文化中大屠杀隐喻的盛行是否暗示了对损失的主要叙事的故意挪用。我认为,自9/11以来的十年中,为了纪念历史类比问题较少的行为,其他纪念性星座被忽略了。最终,我呼吁人们更多关注在没有足够自反性的情况下应用记忆的类比模板的潜在后果。我建议并非总是最明显的联系点可以提供道德上的回忆模式,但隐藏的历史,被遗忘的记忆与9/11的关系开启了最重要的关注点。查看全文下载全文textRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2012.680261

著录项

  • 来源
    《Culture, Theory and Critique》 |2012年第2期|p.111-128|共18页
  • 作者

    Lucy Bond*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:07:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号