...
首页> 外文期刊>Crop and Pasture Science >No-time dough baking performance and mixing properties of Canadian Red Spring wheat cultivars using Canadian and Australian test procedures
【24h】

No-time dough baking performance and mixing properties of Canadian Red Spring wheat cultivars using Canadian and Australian test procedures

机译:使用加拿大和澳大利亚的测试程序,加拿大红春小麦品种的一次性面团烘烤性能和混合特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The mixing properties and baking performance of 17 Canada Western Red Spring wheat varieties and advanced breadwheat lines grown under the same environmental conditions have been assessed using Canadian and Australian test bake procedures with emphasis on no-time dough processes. Mixing times with the Australian rapid dough process (RDP) were considerably shorter than those obtained with the Canadian short process (CSP). However, a very high correlation was obtained for mixing time with the RDP and the CSP, indicating a similar ability to rank cultivar bake mixing requirements. Dough development times obtained from normal and high speed (180 rpm) farinograms and micro-mixograms were found to be poor predictors of CSP and RDP mixing time. Cultivars generally showed good to excellent baking performance with the 2 no-time procedures (RDP and CSP) and the Australian fermented dough procedure (FDP). High correlations and similar cultivar rankings were obtained for loaf volume and bread score with the CSP and FDP. However, no significant correlations and different cultivar rankings were obtained between RDP and CSP (or FDP), indicating that different quality properties may determine relative cultivar baking performance. These results also suggest that both no-time dough procedures may be required in breeder selection and quality monitoring programs to ensure superior breadwheat performance in domestic and export markets.
机译:使用加拿大和澳大利亚的测试烘烤程序(重点是无时间面团加工)评估了在相同环境条件下生长的17个加拿大西部红春小麦品种和高级面包系的混合特性和烘烤性能。澳大利亚快速面团工艺(RDP)的混合时间比加拿大快速面团工艺(CSP)的混合时间短得多。但是,与RDP和CSP的混合时间获得了非常高的相关性,表明对品种烘烤混合要求进行排序的能力相似。发现从正常和高速(180 rpm)的粉质图和微混合图获得的面团发育时间不能很好地预测CSP和RDP混合时间。两种(无时间程序)(RDP和CSP)和澳大利亚发酵面团程序(FDP)通常显示出良好的烘烤性能。通过CSP和FDP获得的面包体积和面包评分获得了高度相关性和相似的品种等级。但是,在RDP和CSP(或FDP)之间未获得显着的相关性和不同的品种等级,这表明不同的质量特性可能决定相对的品种烘烤性能。这些结果还表明,在种鸡选择和质量监控程序中可能都需要使用无时间面团程序,以确保在国内和出口市场上具有优异的面包性能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Crop and Pasture Science》 |1997年第5期|p.587-594|共8页
  • 作者单位

    A Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory, 1404{303 Main Street, Winnipeg, MB,Canada R3C 3G9. CGC Paper No. 746.B Bread Research Institute of Australia Ltd, Delhi Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.C CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, Grain Quality Research Laboratory, Delhi Road, North Ryde,NSW 2113, Australia.D Corresponding author;

    BRI Australia Ltd, PO Box 7, North Ryde, NSW 2113.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    test baking, rapid dough, mixing time, farinograph, mixograph.;

    机译:测试烘烤;快速面团;混合时间;粉质仪;混合仪。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号