首页> 外文期刊>Critical Military Studies >Beyond the hegemonic in the study of militaries, masculinities, and war
【24h】

Beyond the hegemonic in the study of militaries, masculinities, and war

机译:在研究军事,男子气概和战争方面超越霸权主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Across a rich terrain of empirical and theoretical trajectories, the concept of military masculinity (now understood in its plural as military masculinities) has been a significant conceptual tool in both feminist international relations (IR) and in critical men and masculinities studies scholarship. The concept has helped us to unpack the relationships between gender, war, and militarism (Enloe 1993; 2000), including how military standards function in the production of wider normative, hegemonic (Connell 1995; Connell and Messerschmidt 2005; Agathangelou and Ling 2009) manliness. As such, military masculinities has been a rewarding tool for many scholars who take a critical approach to the study of war and the military, enabling us to approach 'military power as a question rather than taking it for granted' (Basham, Belkin, and Gifkins 2015, 1) and deconstruct areas of 'common sense' (Enloe 2004, 1-3) through which gendered military power is reproduced.
机译:在经验和理论轨迹的广阔领域中,军事男子气概(现在以复数形式被理解为军事男子气概)一直是女权主义国际关系(IR)以及批判性男子气概和男子气概研究奖学金的重要概念工具。这个概念帮助我们解开了性别,战争和军国主义之间的关系(Enloe 1993; 2000),包括军事标准如何在更广泛的规范,霸权的生产中发挥作用(Connell 1995; Connell和Messerschmidt 2005; Agathangelou和Ling 2009)。男子气概。因此,对于许多对战争和军事研究持批判态度的学者,军事男子气概是一种有益的工具,使我们能够将“军事力量视为问题而不是理所当然”(Basham,Belkin和Gifkins 2015,1)并解构了“常识”领域(Enloe 2004,1-3),通过该领域再现了性别平等的军事力量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical Military Studies》 |2017年第2期|99-102|共4页
  • 作者

    Amanda Chisholm; Joanna Tidy;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Politics, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK;

    Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号