首页> 外文期刊>Critical Discourse Studies >Death penalty discourses, the printed media, and the UK public sphere: a critical analysis
【24h】

Death penalty discourses, the printed media, and the UK public sphere: a critical analysis

机译:死刑讨论,印刷媒体和英国公共领域:批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper I investigate the lack of full public participation and consequent democratic deficit on the issue of capital punishment in the UK. In so doing I critically analyse the media institutions and practices of the UK public sphere within which the death penalty discourses unfold, and several printed media contributions to the capital punishment discourses around abolition in 1964/1965 and in 1994, the last debate to date on the issue in the UK Parliament. Consequently, I argue that a range of tendencies operating in the public sphere are responsible for the lack of full public participation and democratic deficit on this and other issues. While I am sympathetic with present abolitionist penal policy, I nevertheless argue that these tendencies constitute dominatory practice. In conclusion, by way of remedial practice, I recommend the breakdown of the separation of the institutions of state and civil society and the collective appropriation and social control of the institutions of the public sphere in order to ensure genuinely inclusive and informed deliberation and debate on this and other issues.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCDA, explanatory critique, public sphere, printed media, death penaltyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.491221
机译:在本文中,我调查了英国在死刑问题上缺乏充分的公众参与以及随之而来的民主赤字。在此过程中,我批评性地分析了英国公共领域的媒体制度和实践,其中涉及死刑论述,以及在1964/1965年和1994年废除死刑的几篇平面媒体报道中,迄今为止,上一次辩论英国议会的问题。因此,我认为,在公共领域活动的各种趋势是造成公众在此问题和其他问题上缺乏充分参与和民主赤字的原因。尽管我同情目前的废除死刑政策,但我仍然认为这些趋势构成了支配性做法。最后,我建议通过补救做法,将国家机构与公民社会机构分开,对公共领域机构进行集体拨款和社会控制,以确保真正具有包容性和知情的审议和辩论。此问题和其他问题。查看全文下载全文关键字CDA,解释性批判,公共领域,印刷媒体,死刑facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.491221

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号