...
首页> 外文期刊>Crime, Law and Social Change >From clean up to FICAC: Anti-corruption in Fiji’s post coup politics
【24h】

From clean up to FICAC: Anti-corruption in Fiji’s post coup politics

机译:从清理到FICAC:斐济政变后的反腐败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The leaders of Fiji’s 2006 military coup launched a ‘cleanup campaign’ and set up an Independent Commission Against Corruption. So far it has brought court cases against about 24 people. Among them is the former Prime Minister, who was charged with corruption for his role in institutions designed to promote the economic interests of indigenous Fijians (who constitute about 56% of the population). The article considers what counts as ‘corruption’ in these Affirmative Action policies: a so-called ‘Agriculture Scam’, which distributed farm implements free to Fijian farmers; a company called Fijian Holdings, which received concessional finance from the government; and a Native Land Trust Board, which collects rent on behalf of indigenous landowners. It concludes that army and popular opinion in Fiji hold conceptions of corruption that are much broader than the offences set out in the country’s penal code, and which the new ICAC is attempting to enforce.
机译:斐济2006年军事政变的领导人发起了“清理运动”,并成立了反腐败独立委员会。到目前为止,它已经针对约24人提起了诉讼。其中包括前总理,因其在旨在促进土著斐济人(约占人口的56%)的经济利益的机构中的作用而被指控腐败。本文考虑了在这些平权行动政策中哪些被视为“腐败”:所谓的“农业骗局”,即向斐济农民免费分发农具;一家名为Fijian Holdings的公司,该公司获得了政府的优惠融资;土著土地信托委员会,代表土著土地所有者收取租金。结论是,斐济的军队和民意所持的腐败观念比该国《刑法》所规定的犯罪要广泛得多,而新的廉政公署正在试图实施这种腐败。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Crime, Law and Social Change》 |2010年第1期|55-66|共12页
  • 作者

    Peter Larmour;

  • 作者单位

    Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号