...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Crime >Post-accession malaise? EU conditionality, domestic politics and anti-corruption policy in Hungary
【24h】

Post-accession malaise? EU conditionality, domestic politics and anti-corruption policy in Hungary

机译:加入后不适?欧盟在匈牙利的附加条件,国内政治和反腐败政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Corruption in the then candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe was a major concern for the European Union (EU) before its 2004 enlargement. This concern and its expression in the conditionality of membership constituted strong incentives for the candidate countries' governments to control corruption - or more precisely to take control measures that could be communicated to the European Union. A common assumption in the literature is that with the removal by accession of these incentives anti-corruption efforts would not be maintained at their pre-accession level. But is this really the case? Or have other influences from international organisations, domestic politics or civil society taken over to provide impetus for further corruption control interventions? This article considers these questions with respect to Hungary and finds that while some of the post-2004 measures have been a response to the country's international commitments, there have also been important domestic sources of reform. The results are, however, limited: despite the country's relatively smooth path to the European Union, membership of all the major international legal instruments and three major reform packages since 2000, corruption seems no less prevalent than it was a decade before.View full textDownload full textKeywordsconditionality, anti-corruption, EU, international organisations, HungaryRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17440571003669183
机译:欧盟(EU)在2004年扩大之前,当时的中欧和东欧候选国的腐败是一个主要问题。这种担忧及其在成员资格条件中的表达,强烈地激励了候选国家的政府控制腐败,或者更确切地说,采取了可以传达给欧盟的控制措施。文献中一个普遍的假设是,如果通过加入这些激励措施而将其反腐败努力维持在其加入前的水平。但这是真的吗?还是接管了来自国际组织,国内政治或公民社会的其他影响,以推动进一步的腐败控制措施?本文考虑了与匈牙利有关的这些问题,并发现,尽管2004年后的某些措施是对该国国际承诺的回应,但也有一些重要的国内改革来源。然而结果却是有限的:尽管该国进入欧盟的道路相对平稳,自2000年以来成为所有主要国际法律文书的会员国和三项主要改革方案,但腐败似乎并不比十年前更为普遍。全文关键词关键字条件性,反腐败,欧盟,国际组织,匈牙利“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17440571003669183

著录项

  • 来源
    《Global Crime 》 |2010年第2期| p.164-177| 共14页
  • 作者

    Agnes Batorya*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号