首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >Inside the 'black box': the performance of boards of directors of unlisted companies
【24h】

Inside the 'black box': the performance of boards of directors of unlisted companies

机译:“黑匣子”内部:非上市公司董事会的绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore two under-developed areas of board research: therncorporate governance of unlisted companies; and board behaviour, focusing on process factors thatrncontribute to a board performing effectively.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The Board Effectiveness Questionnaire was completed by 67rndirectors, to gather views on how their board currently operates and how they think it should operate,rnacross various behavioural areas relating to the relationships, decision making, the working climate andrnpredispositions. Analysis of "process losses", the pattern of sub-optimal board behaviour, allowed therntesting of four hypotheses concerning board effectiveness.rnFindings - The 18 most important and five least important behaviours were identified, plus 12 showingrnthegreatest "process loss". Quality of team "relationships" is the main cause of loss whereas evidencernfor the impact of leadership style is mixed. Size of the board is related to overall performance of thernboard but number and proportion of non-executive directors are not.rnResearch limitations/implications - This is a "purposive, judgmental" sample of all unlistedrncompanies, derived from those who were willing and able to respond. Only one director's view of eachrnboard was sought.rnPractical implications - The picture of the "ideal'' board provides a checklist for a company wishing tornassess its board's performance as a working group, highlighting key characteristics that should bernreflected on when discussing director/ board performance. The gaps in board behaviour identifiedrncould help other boards assess their own performance and researchers to focus on these areas.rnOriginality/value - The paper explores two under-researched areas.
机译:目的-本文的目的是探索董事会研究的两个欠发达领域:非上市公司的公司治理;设计/方法/方法-董事会有效性问卷调查由67名董事完成,旨在收集有关董事会当前运作方式以及他们认为应该如何运作以及各种行为的观点。与关系,决策,工作环境和倾向有关的领域。对“过程损失”的分析,即次优的董事会行为模式,可以检验关于董事会有效性的四个假设。研究发现-确定了18个最重要和五个最不重要的行为,另外12个表现出最大的“过程损失”。团队“关系”的质量是造成损失的主要原因,而领导风格影响的证据则好坏参半。董事会的规模与董事会的整体绩效有关,但非执行董事的人数和比例却不相关。研究限制/含义-这是所有未上市公司的“有目的,有判断力”的样本,来源于那些愿意并能够响应。寻求实践中的意义-“理想”董事会的图片提供了一份清单,该清单旨在为一家公司希望评估其董事会作为工作组的绩效,并强调在讨论董事/董事会绩效时应体现的关键特征。确定的董事会行为差距可以帮助其他董事会评估自己的绩效,研究人员可以专注于这些领域。原创性/价值-本文探讨了两个尚未充分研究的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号