首页> 外文期刊>Control Engineering >Performance monitoring and tuning controllers
【24h】

Performance monitoring and tuning controllers

机译:性能监控和调整控制器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tuning controllers by the step response method (CE, February 2007 "Academic Viewpoint") is a tried-and-true method, but not all take the trouble to do it. In 2000, Honeywell engineers surveyed various industries and found the following performance assessment numbers for installed controllers: 16% excellent, 16% acceptable, 22% fair, 10% poor, and 36% open loop. Tuning poorly performing loops on-line is an attractive option because of time efficiency, but widespread application of self-tuning controllers is still not trusted by many control practitioners and plant managers. With thousands of loops in some plants, the goal often is to have closed-loop performance that is more or less satisfactory all of the time, rather than controllers that work optimally some of the time and need attention some of the time.
机译:通过阶跃响应方法(CE,2007年2月,“ Academic Viewpoint”)对控制器进行调整是一种久经考验的方法,但并非所有人都会为此而烦恼。在2000年,霍尼韦尔的工程师对各个行业进行了调查,发现安装的控制器的性能评估数字如下:出色的16%,可接受的16%,合理的22%,较差的10%和开环的36%。由于时间效率高,在线调整性能较差的回路是一个有吸引力的选择,但是许多控制从业人员和工厂经理仍然不相信自调整控制器的广泛应用。在某些工厂中有成千上万的回路,目标通常是要使闭环性能在任何时候都或多或少令人满意,而不是在某些时候最佳工作并且有时需要注意的控制器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号