首页> 外文期刊>Continental Philosophy Review >Hegel’s logic of finitude
【24h】

Hegel’s logic of finitude

机译:黑格尔的有限逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In “Violence and Metaphysics” Jacques Derrida suggests that “the only effective position to take in order not to be enveloped by Hegel would seem to be…to consider false-infinity…irreducible.” Inversely, refuting the charge of logocentrism associated with Hegelian true infinity (wahrhafte Unendlichkeit) would involve showing that Hegel’s speculative logic does not establish the infinity of being exempt from the negativity of the finite. This paper takes up Derrida’s challenge, and argues that true infinity is crucial to Hegel’s understanding of ideality as a question of normative authority, which does not fall prey to logocentrism. Through an exposition of the dialectic of the finite and the infinite in Hegel’s Science of Logic, I argue that true infinity is not an ontological category that eliminates division, but rather refers to the metalogical standpoint involved in a philosophical account of determinacy. Although fully achieved at the end of the Logic, the metalogical standpoint that Hegel elaborates in the Seinslogik under the banner of the true infinite already clarifies that determinacy is a product of normative authority that is itself precarious.
机译:雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)在《暴力与形而上学》一书中指出,“为了不被黑格尔笼罩而采取的唯一有效立场似乎是……考虑虚假无限……是不可约的。”相反,反驳与黑格尔的真正无限性有关的标志中心主义的指控将涉及表明黑格尔的投机逻辑并不能建立免除有限性否定性的无限性。本文解决了德里达的挑战,并认为真正的无限性对于黑格尔将理想作为规范权威的问题的理解至关重要,但这并不妨碍徽标中心主义。通过对黑格尔《逻辑科学》中的有限和无限辩证法的阐述,我认为真正的无限性不是消除分裂的本体论范畴,而是指涉及确定性的哲学解释所涉及的形而上学观点。尽管在逻辑学的末尾已经完全实现了,但黑格尔在真正无限的旗帜下在《先验逻辑》中阐述的形而上学观点已经阐明,确定性是规范权威的产物,而规范权威本身就是不稳定的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号