首页> 外文期刊>Continental Philosophy Review >Realism and belief attribution in Heidegger’s phenomenology of religion
【24h】

Realism and belief attribution in Heidegger’s phenomenology of religion

机译:海德格尔宗教现象学中的现实主义和信仰归属

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay offers a new reading of Heidegger’s early “formally indicative” view of religious life as a broad critique of popular representations of religious life in the human sciences and public discourse. While it has frequently been understood that Heidegger’s work aims at the “enactment” of religious life, the logic and implications of this have been rather unclear to most readers. Presenting that logic, I argue that Heidegger’s point parallels that of Alfred Schutz in suggesting that typical academic discussions of religion constitute a determinate, deficient way of relating to religious individuals and groups and their concerns. Those concerns appear to the researcher herself in a way that they would not if the theorist were actually entertaining them as states of affairs in the real world, leading her to attribute beliefs to a hypothetical “nobody.” Heidegger’s early notion of formal indication explains the logic behind our lack of “realism” toward certain topics of research, and his comments on the study of religious life are a paradigm case for the descriptive fallacies that phenomenology can help to address.
机译:本文提供了对海德格尔早期的宗教生活“形式上具有指示性”观点的新解读,该观点是对人类科学和公共话语中宗教生活的流行表示形式的广泛批评。尽管人们经常认为海德格尔的作品是针对宗教生活的“制定”,但对于大多数读者而言,这种逻辑和含义尚不清楚。提出这种逻辑,我认为海德格尔的观点与阿尔弗雷德·舒茨(Alfred Schutz)的观点相似,他认为典型的宗教学术讨论构成了确定的,不足的与宗教个人和团体及其关切联系的方式。这些担忧对研究者而言似乎是这样的,即如果理论家实际上是按照现实世界中的事态状态来招待他们,从而导致她将信念归因于一个假设的“没人”,那么他们就不会。海德格尔对形式指示的早期概念解释了我们对某些研究主题缺乏“现实主义”的背后逻辑,他对宗教生活的评论是现象学可以帮助解决描述性谬论的范例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号