首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >Exploring the accuracy of electoral polls during campaigns in 2016: only bad press?
【24h】

Exploring the accuracy of electoral polls during campaigns in 2016: only bad press?

机译:探索2016年竞选期间的选举民意测验的准确性:只有不好的新闻报道吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyses the electoral polls published during the previous days to elections in several countries from a comparative perspective. The countries were Austria, Iceland, Ireland, Moldova, Portugal, Scotland, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain and the United States, where elections took place in 2016. In the study, which included 65 different polls, we controlled several electoral and institutional variables in order to find particular patterns regarding party-system fragmentation, electoral volatility and competitiveness, among others. We developed the following hypothesis: the accuracy of electoral polls published during 2016 depends on several institutional, contextual and electoral features. More in depth, we assumed that the final results are more difficult to predict by electoral polls the greater the party-system fragmentation, competitiveness and electoral volatility are, the earlier before Election Day the polls are conducted, the higher the margin of error declared is, and in parliamentary elections compared to presidential ones.
机译:本文从比较的角度分析了前几天在多个国家举行的选举中发布的民意测验。这些国家是奥地利,冰岛,爱尔兰,摩尔多瓦,葡萄牙,苏格兰,塞尔维亚,斯洛伐克,西班牙和美国,这些国家/地区在2016年举行了选举。在这项研究中,我们进行了65次不同的民意测验,其中包括65个不同的民意调查,以便找到有关政党系统分裂,选举动荡和竞争力等方面的特殊模式。我们提出了以下假设:2016年发布的选举民意测验的准确性取决于几个机构,背景和选举特征。更深入地讲,我们认为通过选举民意调查来预测最终结果越难,政党系统的分裂,竞争力和选举波动性越大,在选举日进行的越早,宣布的误差幅度就越大。 ,以及在议会选举中与总统选举相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号