首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary security policy >Local ownership as international governmentality: Evidence from the EU mission in the Horn of Africa
【24h】

Local ownership as international governmentality: Evidence from the EU mission in the Horn of Africa

机译:地方所有权作为国际政府性:来自欧盟在非洲之角的访问的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While some Foucault-inspired studies construe local ownership in international interventions as a form of liberal governmentality that aims to govern through freedom, others lambast it as an illiberal governmentality that is likely to be resisted because it undermines local autonomy. However, we still do not know what is the rationality behind local ownership, how it is being operationalized, and why a principle that aims to govern through freedom ends up curtailing it. I argue that local ownership, echoing the colonial principle of indirect rule, is driven by the rationality of advanced democracies on how best to govern global insecurities at a distance. Consequently, ownership is operationalized as responsibilization for externally designed objectives. This often gives rise to local resistance which undermines international efforts to achieve ownership. I illustrate my arguments with evidence from the EU Mission on Regional Maritime Capacity Building in the Horn of Africa (EUCAP Nestor).
机译:尽管一些受到福柯启发的研究将国际干预中的地方所有权视为一种旨在通过自由进行统治的自由政府形式,但另一些人则称其为非​​政府性政府,因为它破坏了地方自治,因此很可能会遭到抵制。但是,我们仍然不知道地方所有权背后的合理性是什么,如何实现它,以及为什么旨在通过自由进行统治的原则最终会削弱它。我认为,地方所有权与间接统治的殖民原则相呼应,是由先进民主国家就如何最好地远程管理全球不安全问题的合理性驱动的。因此,所有权作为对外部设计目标的责任而被实施。这通常会引起当地的抵制,破坏了为实现所有权的国际努力。我用欧盟非洲之角区域海事能力建设特派团(EUCAP Nestor)的证据来说明我的论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号