首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Politics >Identity and political choice: the co-existence of singular affiliation politics and pluralism
【24h】

Identity and political choice: the co-existence of singular affiliation politics and pluralism

机译:身份与政治选择:单一隶属政治与多元化的并存

获取原文
       

摘要

The debate on identity politics is typically carried out in ideological terms. The phenomenon is associated with affiliation to a singular identity. The critique of this view is thus based on the argument that identities can be robustly plural and individuals choose to emphasise a particular identity in each situation. In this paper the focus is shifted from the ideologies of identity politics to the actual process through which individuals make a choice of identity to emphasise. Using empirical evidence from the south Indian city of Bangalore it argues that it is possible, and indeed perfectly consistent, for a robustly plural society, with a variety of identities to choose from, to support forms of singular affiliation identity politics. A free multiparty democracy can then exist even when its politicians are not committed to moderate ideological stances, because its people keep changing the choice of the identity they choose to emphasise.View full textDownload full textKeywordsidentity, politics, choice, pluralismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2011.552687
机译:关于身份政治的辩论通常以意识形态的方式进行。这种现象与隶属单一身份有关。因此,对这一观点的批评是基于这样的论点,即身份可以强大地复数,而个人在每种情况下都选择强调特定的身份。在本文中,重点从身份政治的意识形态转移到个人选择身份强调的实际过程。利用来自南印度城市班加罗尔的经验证据,它认为,有多种身份可供选择的,强大的多元社会有可能而且确实是完全一致的,以支持形式上的单一从属身份政治。一个自由的多党民主制度即使在其政治家不致力于温和的意识形态立场时也可以存在,因为它的人民不断改变他们选择强调的身份的选择。查看全文下载全文关键字身份,政治,选择,多元主义相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2011.552687

著录项

  • 来源
    《Contemporary Politics》 |2011年第1期|p.35-52|共18页
  • 作者

    Narendar Pania*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号