首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Family Therapy >No party, no society: the EU’s and the US’s differing approaches to providing international aid to political parties
【24h】

No party, no society: the EU’s and the US’s differing approaches to providing international aid to political parties

机译:没有政党,没有社会:欧盟和美国向政党提供国际援助的方式不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While both the EU and the US consider support for civil society an inseparable part of international democracy support schemes, they differ in their understanding of who the key partners for transformation are. US aid to support democratic change in societies includes providing assistance to non-governmental organisations, political parties, trade unions and businesses. In contrast, the EU restricts access to its support primarily to the non-political part of the civil society spectrum. Including political parties and political non-governmental organisations among EU aid recipients would be a quantum leap on the way to a stronger and more comprehensive transition to democracy. This article lays down arguments to support this proposal, draws on ideas from the US experience and outlines basic schemes for its implementation.
机译:欧盟和美国都认为对公民社会的支持是国际民主支持计划不可分割的一部分,但他们对谁是转型的关键伙伴的理解却有所不同。美国为支持社会民主变革而提供的援助包括向非政府组织,政党,工会和企业提供援助。相反,欧盟将获得支持的机会主要限制在民间社会范围的非政治部分。将政党和政治非政府组织纳入欧盟受援国将是向更强大,更全面的民主过渡道路上的一次重大飞跃。本文提出了支持该提议的论点,借鉴了美国经验,并概述了实施该提议的基本方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号