首页> 外文期刊>Construction News >Why collateral warranties are caught in the Act
【24h】

Why collateral warranties are caught in the Act

机译:为什么在该法令中附带担保

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Collateral warranties are commonly used where an agreement needs to be put in place with a third party such as a funder, tenant or purchaser of the property. The contractor or subcontractor warrants to the third party that it has fulfilled or will fulfil its obligations under a construction contract. Usually, the collateral warranty specifies that disputes are to be resolved by the courts. In a judgement last month in the case of Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Laing O'Rourke Wales and West Ltd, Mr Justice Akenhead was asked to consider whether a collateral warranty fell within the scope of the Construction Act. If it did, either party could refer any disputes under it to adjudication.
机译:抵押担保通常用于需要与第三方(例如房地产的出资人,承租人或购买者)达成协议的地方。承包商或分包商向第三方保证已履行或将要履行建筑合同规定的义务。通常,附带保证书规定争议应由法院解决。在上个月针对Parkwood Leisure Ltd诉Laing O'Rourke Wales and West Ltd案的判决中,法官Akenhead先生被要求考虑抵押担保是否属于《建筑法》的范围。如果有,则任何一方均可将其下的任何争议提交裁决。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Construction News》 |2013年第7323a期|26-26|共1页
  • 作者

    ADRIAN BELL;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号