首页> 外文期刊>Constitutional Political Economy >The emergence of institutions in Hayek’s theory: two views or one?
【24h】

The emergence of institutions in Hayek’s theory: two views or one?

机译:哈耶克理论中制度的出现:两种观点还是一种?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Hayek opposes the explanation of the emergence of institutions as “spontaneous (unintentional) order”, which he considers correct, against “constructivism” (viewed as erroneous). This dichotomy exhibits some inconsistencies, for, on Hayek’s account, constructivist ideologies seem able both to prevent the evolutionary emergence of norms and to generate institutions coherent with deliberate, intentional, purposes. If this is so, are there then two views on the emergence of institutions in Hayek’s theory? The paper consequently discusses whether constructivism and evolution of norms are two alternative kinds of explanation, and in particular whether the former can be interpreted in evolutionary terms.
机译:哈耶克反对将制度的出现解释为反对“建构主义”(被认为是错误的)的“自发(无意)秩序”,他认为这是正确的。这种二分法表现出一些矛盾之处,因为按照哈耶克的观点,建构主义意识形态似乎既可以阻止规范的进化出现,又可以产生与故意的,有意的目的相一致的制度。如果是这样,那么关于哈耶克理论中制度的出现,是否有两种看法?因此,本文讨论了建构主义和规范的演化是否是两种可供选择的解释,特别是前者是否可以用演化术语来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号