首页> 外文期刊>Connection Science >Differential retroactive interference in humans following exposure to structured or unstructured learning material: a single distributed neural network account
【24h】

Differential retroactive interference in humans following exposure to structured or unstructured learning material: a single distributed neural network account

机译:暴露于结构化或非结构化学习材料后对人的回溯性差异干扰:单个分布式神经网络帐户

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While retroactive interference (RI) is a well-known phenomenon in humans, the differential effect of the structure of the learning material was only seldom addressed. Mirman and Spivey (2001, Connection Science, 13: 257-275) reported on behavioural results that show more RI for the subjects exposed to 'Structured' items than for those exposed to 'Unstructured' items. These authors claimed that two complementary memory systems functioning on radically different neural mechanisms are required to account for the behavioural results they reported. Using the same paradigm but controlling for proactive interference, we found the opposite pattern of results, that is, more RI for subjects exposed to 'Unstructured' items than for those exposed to 'Structured' items (experiment 1). Two additional experiments showed that this structure effect on RI is a genuine one. Experiment 2 confirmed that the design of experiment 1 forced the subjects from the 'Structured' condition to learn the items at the exemplar level, thus allowing for a close match between the two to-be-compared conditions (as 'Unstructured' condition items can be learned only at the exemplar level). Experiment 3 verified that the subjects from the 'Structured' condition could generalize to novel items. Simulations conducted with a three-layer neural network, that is, a single-memory system, produced a pattern of results that mirrors the structure effect reported here. By construction, Mirman and Spivey's architecture cannot simulate this behavioural structure effect. The results are discussed within the framework of catastrophic interference in distributed neural networks, with an emphasis on the relevance of these networks to the modelling of human memory.
机译:尽管回溯干扰(RI)在人类中是众所周知的现象,但学习材料的结构所产生的差异性影响却很少。 Mirman和Spivey(2001,Connection Science,13:257-275)报告的行为结果显示,暴露于“结构化”物品的受试者的RI高于暴露于“非结构化”物品的受试者的RI。这些作者声称,需要两个在根本不同的神经机制上起作用的互补记忆系统来解释他们报告的行为结果。使用相同的范例但控制主动干扰,我们发现了相反的结果模式,即暴露于“非结构化”项目的受试者的RI比暴露于“结构化”项目的受试者的RI多(实验1)。另外两个实验表明这种结构对RI的影响是真实的。实验2确认实验1的设计迫使受试者从“结构化”条件中学习示例水平的项目,从而允许两个要比较的条件之间紧密匹配(因为“非结构化”条件项目可以仅在示例水平上学习)。实验3验证了来自“结构化”条件的主题可以推广到新颖的项目。使用三层神经网络(即单内存系统)进行的仿真产生了一种结果模式,该模式反映了此处报告的结构效果。通过构造,Mirman和Spivey的体系结构无法模拟这种行为结构效果。在分布式神经网络的灾难性干扰框架内讨论了结果,重点是这些网络与人类记忆建模的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号