【24h】

Introduction

机译:介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As science and environmental studies increasingly challenge us to rethink the nature/culture binary, they also place increased pressure on the traditionally defined institutional category of "the humanities." It seems as though we have arrived at an "animal moment."1 While the animals have always been with us, and we with them and we as one among them, over the course of the last few years several journals have published special issues on animals, including Mosaic, New Formations, Parallax, and TDR: The Journal of Performance Studies. Contemporary criticism seems to be confirming the oft-quoted Levi-Strauss phrase that "animals are good to think with."2 The question becomes this: What are the methods and parameters of such thought and are the animal invited to the table? If so, are they there as companions with whom we break bread, or are they flesh that is eaten, or do they work within some other modality of, perhaps, wildness? The animal poses for us a range of ontological and epistemological questions that is in part why so much is being written about them.
机译:随着科学和环境研究对我们重新思考自然/文化二元性的挑战越来越大,它们也给传统上定义为“人文”的制度类别施加了越来越大的压力。似乎我们已经到了“动物的时刻”。1虽然动物一直与我们在一起,我们与它们在一起,我们也作为其中一员,但在过去的几年中,有几本期刊发表了有关动物,包括马赛克,新编队,视差和TDR:《性能研究杂志》。当代的批评似乎正在证实经常被引用的列维-史特劳斯(Levi-Strauss)的短语,即“动物可以很好地思考。” 2问题就变成了:这种思想的方法和参数是什么,是否邀请动物来餐桌?如果是这样,他们是作为陪伴我们的人来与他们一起做面包吗?还是他们吃了肉?或者他们是否在某种其他的野性工作方式下工作?这种动物给我们带来了一系列本体论和认识论的问题,部分原因就是为什么关于它们的文章太多。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Configurations》 |2006年第2期|1-7|共7页
  • 作者

    Richard Nash; Ron Broglio;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University;

    Georgia Institute of Technology;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:09:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号