首页> 外文期刊>International journal of comadem >An approach to evaluate wheel-rail match properties considering the flexibility of ballastless track: Comparison of rigid and flexible track models in wheel-rail profile matching
【24h】

An approach to evaluate wheel-rail match properties considering the flexibility of ballastless track: Comparison of rigid and flexible track models in wheel-rail profile matching

机译:考虑无ball轨道柔性的轮轨匹配特性评估方法:轮轨轮廓匹配中刚性和柔性轨道模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many different wheel/rail profiles are used in the China high-speed railway, and vehicle operation safety and comfort will decrease if the inappropriatewheel-rail profile pair is used. To solve the problem of estimating the wheel-rail match, many numerical models, including vehicle system dynamic modelsand wheel-rail rolling contact models, have been established to analyse the wheel-rail dynamic responses. Both methods have less consideration of theflexibility and vibration characteristics of ballastless track, leading to deviations in the calculation of middle and high frequency vibration. This paperproposes a vehicle-flexible track coupling model and compares it with the vehicle dynamic model (vehicle-rigid track model). In the rigid track model, onlythe track irregularities are considered in the track module; the vibrations and deformations of rails, track slab and the foundation are considered in theflexible track model. Taking Chinese CRH3 series wheel profile S1002CN and rail profile CHN60 as examples and considering different track excitations,the two models are compared. The wheel-rail interaction forces, wheel-rail wear depths, wear volumes and vehicle accelerations are chosen as analysisindices for the comparative study.The results show that the wheel-rail forces of the flexible track model are larger than the rigid track model in the frequency range from 70 to 120Hz, whilethey decrease obviously in the frequency range above 150Hz. The differences in wear depths and volumes between the two models exceed 10%. Therefore,the flexible track model should be considered when studying the match properties of different wheel-rail pairs.
机译:中国高铁使用了许多不同的轮轨轮廓,如果使用不合适的轮轨轮廓对,则会降低车辆的操作安全性和舒适性。为了解决估计轮轨匹配的问题,建立了许多数值模型,包括车辆系统动力学模型和轮轨滚动接触模型,以分析轮轨动力学响应。两种方法都较少考虑无ball轨道的柔韧性和振动特性,从而导致中高频振动的计算出现偏差。本文提出了一种车辆-柔性轨道耦合模型,并将其与车辆动力学模型(车辆-刚性轨道模型)进行了比较。在刚性轨道模型中,在轨道模块中仅考虑轨道不规则性;在柔性轨道模型中考虑了轨道,平板和基础的振动和变形。以中国CRH3系列车轮轮廓S1002CN和轨道轮廓CHN60为例,并考虑不同的轨道激励,对两种模型进行了比较。选择轮轨相互作用力,轮轨磨损深度,磨损量和车辆加速度作为比较研究的分析指标。频率范围从70到120Hz,而在150Hz以上的频率范围则明显下降。两种型号之间的磨损深度和体积差异超过10%。因此,在研究不同轮轨对的匹配特性时,应考虑柔性轨道模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号